Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25392739›Full record

ArticleISRN Molecular Imaging2013

Subcutaneous administration of D-luciferin is an effective alternative to intraperitoneal injection in bioluminescence imaging of xenograft tumors in nude mice.

Ashraf A Khalil, Mark J Jameson, William C Broaddus, Theodore D Chung, Sarah E Golding, Seth M Dever, Elisabeth Rosenberg, Kristoffer Valerie

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN Molecular Imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Bioluminescent Systems for Theranostic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashraf A KhalilDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, P.O BOX 800713 Charlottesville, VA 22908-0713, USA ; Department of Biochemistry, National Liver Institute, Menoufiya University, Shebin Elkom 32511, Egypt.
Mark J JamesonDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, P.O BOX 800713 Charlottesville, VA 22908-0713, USA.
William C BroaddusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Theodore D ChungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Georgia Health University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Sarah E GoldingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Seth M DeverDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Elisabeth RosenbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Kristoffer ValerieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · USAugusta University Health · US

Funding

ATM as target for malignant glioma radiosensitization.R01NS064593 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI VALERIE, KRISTOFFER CARL · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Targeting invasion and DNA DSB repair in glioma with a multi-pronged approach.R21CA156995 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI VALERIE, KRISTOFFER CARL · 2011 to 2012
$358k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA156995NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, intraperitoneal (IP) injection of D-luciferin is the preferred method of providing substrate for bioluminescent imaging (BLI); however it has a failure rate of 3-10% due to accidental intestinal injection. The present study evaluates the quality of BLI after subcutaneous (SC) injection of D-luciferin and demonstrates the effectiveness of SC injection in anatomically disparate tumor models. Mice bearing luciferase-expressing tumors underwent BLI after SC or IP injection of D-luciferin. The average time to maximal luminescence was 6 min (range 5-9 min) after SC injection and 8 min (range 5-8 min) after IP injection. Within 7 minutes of injection, SC and IP routes yielded similar luminescence in subcutaneous, intracranial, tongue, and lung xenograft tumor models. In a model of combined subcutaneous and intracranial xenografts, SC injection resulted in proportional luminescence at all sites, confirming that preferential delivery of substrate does not occur. While tumors were occasionally not visualized with IP injection, all tumors were visualized reliably with SC injection. Thus, SC injection of D-luciferin is a convenient and effective alternative to IP injection for BLI in nude mice. It may be a preferable approach, particularly for tumors with weaker signals and/or when greater precision is required.

Indexed as

bioluminescenceD-luciferin

Identifiers

PMID25392739
PMCPMC4226276
OpenAlexW2034880566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.