ReviewCancer informatics2014
Predicting cancer prognosis using functional genomics data sets.
Review in Cancer informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNA-623 inhibits tumor progression and is a predictor of poor prognosis of breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- The clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of EMMPRIN overexpression in cancers: evidence from 39 cohort studies.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Article
- Health Informatics via Machine Learning for the Clinical Management of Patients.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2015Review
- Prognostic value of melanoma cell adhesion molecule expression in cancers: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Network and pathway analysis of cancer susceptibility (a).Cancer informatics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elucidating the molecular basis of human cancers is an extremely complex and challenging task. A wide variety of computational tools and experimental techniques have been used to address different aspects of this characterization. One major hurdle faced by both clinicians and researchers has been to pinpoint the mechanistic basis underlying a wide range of prognostic outcomes for the same type of cancer. Here, we provide an overview of various computational methods that have leveraged different functional genomics data sets to identify molecular signatures that can be used to predict prognostic outcome for various human cancers. Furthermore, we outline challenges that remain and future directions that may be explored to address them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.