Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25392694›Full record

ReviewCancer informatics2014

Learning dysregulated pathways in cancers from differential variability analysis.

Bahman Afsari, Donald Geman, Elana J Fertig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifying the mRNAs associated with Bladder cancer recurrence.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of Alternative Splicing Events in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Identifies an Oncogenic DOCK5 Variant.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Digitizing omics profiles by divergence from a baseline.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bahman AfsariPostdoctoral Fellow, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Donald GemanProfessor, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elana J FertigAssistant Professor, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Dynamical Models of Cetuximab Resistance in HNSCC Based on Serial Genomics DataR01CA177669 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FERTIG, ELANA · 2014 to 2019
$1.8M
Identifying Malignant Cell Signaling from Protein Interactions an Polyomic DataK25CA141053 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FERTIG, ELANA · 2010 to 2014
$419k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA141053NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of gene sets can implicate activity in signaling pathways that is responsible for cancer initiation and progression, but is not discernible from the analysis of individual genes. Multiple methods and software packages have been developed to infer pathway activity from expression measurements for set of genes targeted by that pathway. Broadly, three major methodologies have been proposed: over-representation, enrichment, and differential variability. Both over-representation and enrichment analyses are effective techniques to infer differentially regulated pathways from gene sets with relatively consistent differentially expressed (DE) genes. Specifically, these algorithms aggregate statistics from each gene in the pathway. However, they overlook multivariate patterns related to gene interactions and variations in expression. Therefore, the analysis of differential variability of multigene expression patterns can be essential to pathway inference in cancers. The corresponding methodologies and software packages for such multivariate variability analysis of pathways are reviewed here. We also introduce a new, computationally efficient algorithm, expression variation analysis (EVA), which has been implemented along with a previously proposed algorithm, Differential Rank Conservation (DIRAC), in an open source R package, gene set regulation (GSReg). EVA inferred similar pathways as DIRAC at reduced computational costs. Moreover, EVA also inferred different dysregulated pathways than those identified by enrichment analysis.

Indexed as

gene expressiongene set analysismultivariate analysisvariability analysis

Identifiers

PMID25392694
PMCPMC4218688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.