Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25392589›Full record

SynthesisAfrican journal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicines : AJTCAM2014

Da-cheng-qi decoction, a traditional Chinese herbal formula, for intestinal obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bo Yang, Feng-Ying Xu, Hai-Jing Sun, Zui Zou, Xue-Yin Shi, Chang-Quan Ling, Ling Tang

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in African journal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicines : AJTCAM, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo YangKidney institute of CPLA, Division of Nephrology, Changzheng hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Feng-Ying XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hai-Jing SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zui ZouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xue-Yin ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chang-Quan LingDepartment of traditional Chinese medicine, Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ling TangDepartment of traditional Chinese medicine, Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was aimed at determining the effects and safety of Da-Cheng-Qi decoction (DCQD) or DCQD combined with conservative therapy in patients with intestinal obstruction. MATERIALS AND

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and several other databases were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of DCQD or DCQD plus conservative therapy in patients with intestinal obstruction were eligible. Therapeutic effect was estimated by the improvement of clinical manifestations and diagnostic imaging; dichotomous/ordinal data assessment of overall response to therapy, adverse effects; or continuous variable were identified, including time to first bowel movement, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay.

resultsSixty eligible RCTs including 6,095 patients were identified. Response rate: (1) DCQD versus conservative therapy (6 RCTs, 361 patients, RR of respond =1.13; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.31). (2) DCQD plus conservative therapy versus conservative therapy (48 RCTs, 4,916 patients, RR of respond =1.25 which favoured DCQD plus conservative therapy; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.30). Treatment effect remained similar when RCTs at high risk of bias were excluded. Time to first flatus postoperatively: (1) DCQD versus conservative therapy (2 RCTs, 240 patients, SMD=-3.65; 95% CI -8.17 to 0.87). (2) DCQD plus conservative therapy versus conservative therapy (11 RCTs, 1,040 patients, SMD=-2.09 which favoured DCQD plus conservative therapy; 95% CI -3.04 to -1.15).

conclusionDCQD combined with conservative therapy may increase the success rate of conservative therapy for intestinal obstruction significantly and can shorten the duration of postoperative ileus in patients undergoing abdominal surgery compared with conservative therapy alone.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaPhytotherapyCitrusDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansIntestinal ObstructionMagnoliaPostoperative ComplicationsRheumDa-Cheng-QiDrugs, Chinese HerbalDa-Cheng-Qi-TangIleusIntestinal ObstructionIntestinal Pseudo-ObstructionMeta-Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25392589
PMCPMC4202405
OpenAlexW1973451861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.