Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25392475›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Secondary contact seeds phenotypic novelty in cichlid fishes.

Paul Nichols, Martin J Genner, Cock van Oosterhout, Alan Smith, Paul Parsons, Harold Sungani, Jennifer Swanstrom, Domino A Joyce

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Continuous 1.3-million-year record of East African hydroclimate, and implications for patterns of evolution and biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul NicholsSchool of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Martin J GennerSchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK m.genner@bristol.ac.uk.
Cock van OosterhoutSchool of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK School of Environmental Science, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Alan SmithSchool of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Paul ParsonsSchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Harold SunganiSchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Jennifer SwanstromSchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Domino A JoyceSchool of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK d.joyce@hull.ac.uk.
University of Hull · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory proposes that genomic admixture between formerly reproductively isolated populations can generate phenotypic novelty for selection to act upon. Secondary contact may therefore be a significant promoter of phenotypic novelty that allows species to overcome environmental challenges and adapt to novel environments, including during adaptive radiation. To date, this has largely been considered from the perspective of interspecific hybridization at contact zones. However, it is also possible that this process occurs more commonly between natural populations of a single species, and thus its importance in adaptive evolution may have been underestimated. In this study, we tested the consequences of genomic introgression during apparent secondary contact between phenotypically similar lineages of the riverine cichlid fish Astatotilapia calliptera. We provide population genetic evidence of a secondary contact zone in the wild, and then demonstrate using mate-choice experiments that both lineages can reproduce together successfully in laboratory conditions. Finally, we show that genomically admixed individuals display extreme phenotypes not observed in the parental lineages. Collectively, the evidence shows that secondary contact can drive the evolution of phenotypic novelty, suggesting that pulses of secondary contact may repeatedly seed genetic novelty, which when coupled with ecological opportunity could promote rapid adaptive evolution in natural circumstances.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticPhenotypeAnimalsCichlidsFish ProteinsGenetic SpeciationMalawiMolecular Sequence DataMozambiquePhylogenyPhylogeographySequence Analysis, DNASexual Behavior, AnimalFish Proteinsadmixturehaplochromine fishesintrogressionphenotypic noveltyriver capturesecondary contact

Identifiers

PMID25392475
PMCPMC4262179
OpenAlexW2167668033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.