ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015
Comparative evaluation of a new commercial colorimetric microdilution assay (SensiQuattro Candida EU) with MIC test strip and EUCAST broth microdilution methods for susceptibility testing of invasive Candida isolates.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- First Synthesis of DBU-Conjugated Cationic Carbohydrate Derivatives and Investigation of Their Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Melanins Protect Sporothrix brasiliensis and Sporothrix schenckii from the Antifungal Effects of Terbinafine.PloS one · 2016Article
- SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST FOR FUNGI: CLINICAL AND LABORATORIAL CORRELATIONS IN MEDICAL MYCOLOGY.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Candidemia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients. Candida isolates must be cultivated, identified, and tested for susceptibility. We compared the performance of a new colorimetric broth microdilution panel (SensiQuattro Candida EU) for antifungal susceptibility testing to that of Liofilchem's MIC test strip and the EUCAST reference broth microdilution protocol. We tested 187 blood culture isolates of 5 Candida spp. (120 C. albicans, 38 C. glabrata, 10 C. parapsilosis, 12 C. tropicalis, and 7 C. krusei) against seven antifungal agents (amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin) and interpreted the MICs according to the EUCAST recommendations. If applicable, the overall essential agreement (EA) of the SensiQuattro panel with the reference broth microdilution was slightly higher for C. albicans (87%) than for other species (85.8%). We found that SensiQuattro performed best in testing amphotericin B (EA, 100%), voriconazole (EA, 93.7%), and posaconazole (EA, 94.8%) against C. albicans, but its error rate for this species was high (29.6%) because of mainly major errors (26.7%) in testing anidulafungin and micafungin. Compared to the SensiQuattro panel, the MIC test strip exhibited a higher level of agreement for most isolates. SensiQuattro assays are easy to perform, but they are currently not suitable for testing echinocandins against Candida spp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.