Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25391979›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2015

The role of resection alone in select children with intracranial ependymoma: the Canadian Pediatric Brain Tumour Consortium experience.

Tamir Ailon, Christopher Dunham, Anne-Sophie Carret, Uri Tabori, P Daniel Mcneely, Shayna Zelcer, Beverley Wilson, Lucie Lafay-Cousin, Donna Johnston, David D Eisenstat and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis on therapeutic outcomes and prognostic factors of intracranial ependymoma: a report of 49 clinical cases in a single center.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Article
  9. Advances in Management of Pediatric Ependymomas.Current oncology reports · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Tamir AilonDivision of Neurology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Room K3-147, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H3 V4, Canada.
Christopher Dunham
Anne-Sophie Carret
Uri Tabori
P Daniel Mcneely
Shayna Zelcer
Beverley Wilson
Lucie Lafay-Cousin
Donna Johnston
David D Eisenstat
Marianna Silva
Nada Jabado
Karen Jane Goddard
Chris Fryer
Glenda Hendson
Cynthia Hawkins
Sandra Dunn
Stephen Yip
Ashutosh Singhal
Juliette Hukin
British Columbia Children's Hospital · CABC Cancer Agency · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAAlberta Children's Hospital · CACancerCare Manitoba · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAChild and Family Research Institute · CAChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAKingston General Hospital · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAStollery Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGross total resection (GTR) of intracranial ependymoma is an accepted goal. More controversial is radiotherapy deferral. This study reports on children treated with gross total resection who did not receive upfront adjuvant radiotherapy.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of children with intracranial ependymoma in 12 Canadian centers. Patients who had GTR of their tumor and no upfront radiotherapy were identified. Immunostaining was performed for Ki-67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and EZH2 on archived tissue. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and compared with those who had GTR followed by radiation.

resultsTwenty-six children were identified treated with GTR alone at diagnosis; 12 posterior fossa ependymoma (PFE) WHO grade II, and 14 supratentorial ependymoma (STE). Progression-free survival (PFS) in ependymoma treated with GTR alone at diagnosis was inferior in those with high Ki-67 or positive EZH2 immunostaining. Survival was inferior for patients less than 2 years old at diagnosis (p = 0.002). Survival was comparable to PFE WHO grade II and STE who had GTR followed by radiation (p = 0.62). Five-year PFS and overall survival (OS) of those treated with GTR alone were 60 and 70% respectively for PFE and 45 and 70% respectively for STE (p = 0.2; 0.55).

conclusionsThis study suggests that there is a subset of children with certain biologic features who, in the setting of a prospective clinical trial, might be candidates for observation following GTR. Good risk factors for this approach include age of 2 years or older, low Ki-67, and negative EZH2. If relapse occurs, it may be confined to the primary site, allowing for possible salvage with GTR followed by XRT.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrain NeoplasmsCanadaChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health PlanningEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEpendymomaErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMaleNeurosurgeryEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinErbB ReceptorsEZH2 protein, humanKi-67 AntigenPolycomb Repressive Complex 2

Identifiers

PMID25391979
OpenAlexW2067914679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.