ArticleBioTechniques2014
Marking cells with infrared fluorescent proteins to preserve photoresponsiveness in the retina.
Article in BioTechniques, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Trends of Bacterial and Fungal Optoproteins for Novel Optical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Near-infrared and far-red genetically encoded indicators of neuronal activity.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2021Article
- Near-Infrared Fluorescent Proteins: Multiplexing and Optogenetics across Scales.Trends in biotechnology · 2018Review
- Bacterial Phytochromes, Cyanobacteriochromes and Allophycocyanins as a Source of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Near-infrared fluorescent protein iRFP713 as a reporter protein for optogenetic vectors, a transgenic Cre-reporter rat, and other neuronal studies.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2017Article
- Near-infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from bacterial phytochromes.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Green fluorescent protein (GFP) and its derivatives are broadly used in biomedical experiments for labeling particular cells or molecules. In the mouse retina, the light (~500 nm) used to excite GFP can also lead to photoreceptor bleaching (peak ~500 nm), which diminishes photoreceptor-mediated synaptic transmission in the retinal network. To overcome this problem, we investigated the use of infrared fluorescent protein (iRFP) as a marker since it is excited by light in the near-infrared range that would not damage the photoresponsiveness of the retina. Initially, we tested iRFP expression in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells to confirm that conventional fluorescence microscopy can detect iRFP fluorescence. We next introduced the iRFP plasmid into adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV-2) and injected the resulting AAV-2 solution into the intraocular space. Retinal neurons were found to successfully express iRFP three weeks post-injection. Light-evoked responses in iRFP-marked cells were assessed using patch clamping, and light sensitivity was found to be similar in iRFP-expressing cells and non-iRFP-expressing cells, an indication that iRFP expression and detection do not affect retinal light responsiveness. Taken together, our results suggest iRFP can be a new tool for vision research, allowing for single-cell recordings from an iRFP marked neuron using conventional fluorescence microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.