Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25391883›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2014

[Improve of surgical outcomes in spinal fusion surgery : evidence based peri- and intra-operative aspects to reduce complications and earlier recovery].

C Fleege, A Almajali, M Rauschmann, M Rickert

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C FleegeAbteilung für Wirbelsäulenorthopädie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528, Frankfurt a.M., Deutschland, c.fleege@friedrichsheim.de.
A Almajali
M Rauschmann
M Rickert
Orthopaedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim · DEOrthopädische Universitätsklinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBecause international data have a low level of evidence, a variety of treatment approaches for lumbar spine fusion operations are justified based on long-established or safety aspects. The aim of this work is to present an overview of evidence-based peri- and intraoperative treatment measures to shorten the recovery and increase patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis review article is based on a selective literature search that also included PubMed on peri- and intraoperative treatment measures for lumbar spinal surgery. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Peri- and intraoperative treatment algorithms have a significant influence on postoperative recovery and patient outcome after lumbar spinal surgery. Recent studies show that intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion can be significantly reduced by optimizing patient positioning and dorsoventral combined warming measures to maintain body temperature. These measures are supplemented by the use of local infiltration of anesthesia and vasoconstrictive drugs at the start and high-dose administration of tranexamic acid in the early stages of the operation. Use of an epidural catheter significantly reduces postoperative, systemic analgesia use and allows rapid mobilization to be initiated. Immobilizing drain and corset treatments can be limited to complex cases. These treatment measures promote patient satisfaction, lead to high-quality, evidence-based care, and contribute to a shorter hospital stay and convalescence of the patient.

Indexed as

Length of StayEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativePostoperative PainSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25391883
OpenAlexW98289367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.