Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25391455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Customized patterned substrates for highly versatile correlative light-scanning electron microscopy.

Lorena Benedetti, Elisa Sogne, Simona Rodighiero, Davide Marchesi, Paolo Milani, Maura Francolini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorena Benedetti1] Fondazione Filarete for Biosciences and Innovation, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139, Milan, Italy [2] Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, and National Research Council (CNR) Neuroscience Institute, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milan, Italy.
Elisa Sogne1] Fondazione Filarete for Biosciences and Innovation, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139, Milan, Italy [2] Interdisciplinary Centre for Nanostructured Materials and Interfaces (CIMaINa), and Department of Physics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy [3] European School of Molecular Medicine (SEMM), IFOM-IEO, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milano, Italy.
Simona RodighieroFondazione Filarete for Biosciences and Innovation, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139, Milan, Italy.
Davide MarchesiFondazione Filarete for Biosciences and Innovation, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Milani1] Fondazione Filarete for Biosciences and Innovation, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139, Milan, Italy [2] Interdisciplinary Centre for Nanostructured Materials and Interfaces (CIMaINa), and Department of Physics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Maura Francolini1] Fondazione Filarete for Biosciences and Innovation, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139, Milan, Italy [2] Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, and National Research Council (CNR) Neuroscience Institute, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correlative light electron microscopy (CLEM) combines the advantages of light and electron microscopy, thus making it possible to follow dynamic events in living cells at nanometre resolution. Various CLEM approaches and devices have been developed, each of which has its own advantages and technical challenges. We here describe our customized patterned glass substrates, which improve the feasibility of correlative fluorescence/confocal and scanning electron microscopy.

Identifiers

PMID25391455
PMCPMC4229662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.