Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25391277›Full record

Trial reportJournal of dual diagnosis2014

Remote "hovering" with individuals with psychotic disorders and substance use: feasibility, engagement, and therapeutic alliance with a text-messaging mobile interventionist.

Dror Ben-Zeev, Susan M Kaiser, Izabela Krzos

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of dual diagnosis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dror Ben-Zeeva Department of Psychiatry , Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Lebanon , New Hampshire , USA.
Susan M Kaiser
Izabela Krzos
Northwestern University · USThresholds · US

Funding

Development of a Mobile System for Self-management of Schizophrenia (SOS)R34MH100195 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BEN-ZEEV, DROR · 2013 to 2015
$688k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH100195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePeople with serious mental illnesses and substance abuse problems (i.e., dual diagnosis) constitute a particularly challenging and costly clinical group. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel model of care in which a mobile interventionist used mobile phone text messaging to remotely monitor and provide daily support to individuals with psychotic disorders and substance use.

methodsSeventeen participants with dual diagnosis were enrolled in a 12-week single-arm trial. A clinical social worker served as the mobile interventionist and sent daily text messages to participants' privately owned mobile phones to assess their medication adherence and clinical status. The mobile interventionist provided text-message feedback and support and suggested various coping strategies flexibly, in response to participants' replies to prompts. At the end of the trial, participants completed a usability and satisfaction measure and two self-rated measures of therapeutic alliance with their clinicians. In one version, participants rated their relationship with their mobile interventionist; in the second version, they rated their relationship with their community-based treatment team.

resultsParticipants received an average of 139 text messages (SD = 37.5) each from the mobile interventionist over the 12-week trial. On average, participants responded to 87% of the mobile interventionist's messages that required a reply. More than 90% of participants thought the intervention was useful and rewarding and that it helped them be more effective and productive in their lives. Participants' assessments of their relationship with the mobile interventionist were positive. Paired-sample t-test found that the therapeutic alliance ratings participants provided for their mobile interventionist were significantly higher than those provided for their community-based treatment team clinicians, who they met with regularly.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that text-message "hovering" can be conducted successfully with individuals with psychotic disorders and substance abuse. Developing a cadre of mobile interventionists who are specifically trained on how to engage patients via mobile devices while adhering to ethical guidelines and regulatory standards may be an effective way to strengthen service delivery models, improve patient outcomes, and reduce costs.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAntipsychotic AgentsComorbidityFeasibility StudiesFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMonitoring, AmbulatoryPatient SatisfactionPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSocial SupportAntipsychotic Agentsdual diagnosismobile health (mHealth)mobile phonesschizophreniaSMS

Identifiers

PMID25391277
PMCPMC4231298
OpenAlexW2023764053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.