Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25391133›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Decitabine rescues cisplatin resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Chi T Viet, Dongmin Dang, Stacy Achdjian, Yi Ye, Samuel G Katz, Brian L Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: current and emerging therapeutic strategies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chi T VietDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America; Bluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Dongmin DangBluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Stacy AchdjianBluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Yi YeBluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Samuel G KatzBluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Brian L SchmidtDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America; Bluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Center for Clinical Research (United States) · USNew York University · US

Funding

The Role of Proteases and Peptides in Cancer PainR01DE019796 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI HARDT, MARKUS, SCHMIDT, BRIAN L · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019796NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE19796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) reduces survival. In this study we hypothesized that methylation of key genes mediates cisplatin resistance. We determined whether a demethylating drug, decitabine, could augment the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of cisplatin on SCC-25/CP, a cisplatin-resistant tongue SCC cell line. We showed that decitabine treatment restored cisplatin sensitivity in SCC-25/CP and significantly reduced the cisplatin dose required to induce apoptosis. We then created a xenograft model with SCC-25/CP and determined that decitabine and cisplatin combination treatment resulted in significantly reduced tumor growth and mechanical allodynia compared to control. To establish a gene classifier we quantified methylation in cancer tissue of cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant HNSCC patients. Cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant patient tumors had distinct methylation profiles. When we quantified methylation and expression of genes in the classifier in HNSCC cells in vitro, we showed that decitabine treatment of cisplatin-resistant HNSCC cells reversed methylation and gene expression toward a cisplatin-sensitive profile. The study provides direct evidence that decitabine restores cisplatin sensitivity in in vitro and in vivo models of HNSCC. Combination treatment of cisplatin and decitabine significantly reduces HNSCC growth and HNSCC pain. Furthermore, gene methylation could be used as a biomarker of cisplatin-resistance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCisplatinDecitabineDNA MethylationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineBiomarkers, TumorCisplatinDecitabine

Identifiers

PMID25391133
PMCPMC4229295
OpenAlexW1992366236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.