Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25391045›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of statins in the central nervous system.

Amelia J McFarland, Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie, Devinder S Arora, Gary D Grant, Catherine M McDermott, Anthony V Perkins, Andrew K Davey

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Associations of different types of statins with the risk of open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Statins for the prevention of dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Modulatory Effects ofNutrients · 2026
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amelia J McFarlandSchool of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Queensland 4222, Australia. a.mcfarland@griffith.edu.au.
Shailendra Anoopkumar-DukieSchool of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Queensland 4222, Australia. s.dukie@griffith.edu.au.
Devinder S AroraSchool of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Queensland 4222, Australia. d.arora@griffith.edu.au.
Gary D GrantSchool of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Queensland 4222, Australia. g.grant@griffith.edu.au.
Catherine M McDermottDepartment of Biomedical Science, Bond University, Queensland 4226, Australia. camcderm@bond.edu.au.
Anthony V PerkinsGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Queensland 4222, Australia. a.perkins@griffith.edu.au.
Andrew K DaveySchool of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Queensland 4222, Australia. a.davey@griffith.edu.au.
Griffith University · AUBond University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, commonly referred to as statins, are widely used in the treatment of dyslipidaemia, in addition to providing primary and secondary prevention against cardiovascular disease and stroke. Statins' effects on the central nervous system (CNS), particularly on cognition and neurological disorders such as stroke and multiple sclerosis, have received increasing attention in recent years, both within the scientific community and in the media. Current understanding of statins' effects is limited by a lack of mechanism-based studies, as well as the assumption that all statins have the same pharmacological effect in the central nervous system. This review aims to provide an updated discussion on the molecular mechanisms contributing to statins' possible effects on cognitive function, neurodegenerative disease, and various neurological disorders such as stroke, epilepsy, depression and CNS cancers. Additionally, the pharmacokinetic differences between statins and how these may result in statin-specific neurological effects are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCognitionDepressionEpilepsyHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsNeurodegenerative DiseasesStrokeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25391045
PMCPMC4264186
OpenAlexW2166094628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.