Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25390637›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2014

Vancomycin dosing in neutropenic patients.

Michiel B Haeseker, Sander Croes, Cees Neef, Cathrien A Bruggeman, Leo M L Stolk, Annelies Verbon

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michiel B HaesekerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sander CroesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Cees NeefDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Cathrien A BruggemanDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Leo M L StolkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Annelies VerbonDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with and without neutropenia.

methodsPatients ≥18 years admitted on general wards were included. Routinely vancomycin trough and peak plasma concentrations were measured with a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Pharmacokinetic parameters of individual patients were determined with maximum a posterior Bayesian estimation (MW Pharm 3.60). Neutropenia was defined as neutrophils <0.5×109 cells/L. PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 171 patients were included. Patients with neutropenia (n = 56) had higher clearance of vancomycin (CLva), 67 (±26) mL/min, compared to patients without neutropenia (n = 115), CLva 50 (±22) mL/min (p<0.001). No significant difference was found in serum creatinine and vancomycin volume of distribution. Neutropenia was positively associated with CLva, independently of relevant co-variables (B: 12.122, 95%CI: 1.095 to 23.149, p = 0.031). On average patients with neutropenia needed 33% higher doses of vancomycin to attain adequate exposure, i.e. AUC24≥400 mg×h/L. Furthermore, 15 initially neutropenic patients in our study group received vancomycin for a second administration period. Ten patients received the second administration period during another neutropenic period and 5 patients during a non-neutropenic phase. All 5 patients with vancomycin during both neutropenic and non-neutropenic phase had higher CLva (91 (±26) mL/min) during the neutropenic period and lower CLva (45 (±10) mL/min) during the non-neutropenic phase (p = 0.009).

conclusionThis study shows that most patients with neutropenia have augmented CLva. In a small group of patients that received vancomycin during two episodes, the augmented CLva seems to be reversible in the non-neutropenic period. Our data indicate that it is important to increase the daily dose with one third in patients with neutropenia (from 15 mg/kg twice daily to 13 mg/kg three times daily). Frequent performance of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with neutropenia may prevent both therapy failure due to low AUCs and overcomes toxicity due to high vancomycin trough concentrations during recovery from neutropenia.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveBayes TheoremDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeutropeniaVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID25390637
PMCPMC4229181
OpenAlexW2045117239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.