Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25390333›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Reprogramming suppresses premature senescence phenotypes of Werner syndrome cells and maintains chromosomal stability over long-term culture.

Akira Shimamoto, Harunobu Kagawa, Kazumasa Zensho, Yukihiro Sera, Yasuhiro Kazuki, Mitsuhiko Osaki, Mitsuo Oshimura, Yasuhito Ishigaki, Kanya Hamasaki, Yoshiaki Kodama and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Akira ShimamotoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Harunobu KagawaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kazumasa ZenshoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukihiro SeraDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yasuhiro KazukiDepartment of Biomedical Science, Institute of Regenerative Medicine and Biofunction, Graduate School of Medical Science, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Mitsuhiko OsakiDepartment of Biomedical Science, Institute of Regenerative Medicine and Biofunction, Graduate School of Medical Science, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan; Division of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Mitsuo OshimuraDepartment of Biomedical Science, Institute of Regenerative Medicine and Biofunction, Graduate School of Medical Science, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Yasuhito IshigakiMedical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa, Japan.
Kanya HamasakiDepartment of Genetics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yoshiaki KodamaDepartment of Genetics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinsuke YuasaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi FukudaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyotaro HirashimaDivision of Molecular Biotherapy, The Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki SeimiyaDivision of Molecular Biotherapy, The Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KoyamaDepartment of Advanced Aging Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Takahiko ShimizuDepartment of Advanced Aging Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Minoru TakemotoDepartment of Clinical Cell Biology and Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Koutaro YokoteDepartment of Clinical Cell Biology and Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Makoto GotoDivision of Orthopedic Surgery & Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidetoshi TaharaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JPChiba University · JPTottori University · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKeio University · JPRadiation Effects Research Foundation · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Werner syndrome (WS) is a premature aging disorder characterized by chromosomal instability and cancer predisposition. Mutations in WRN are responsible for the disease and cause telomere dysfunction, resulting in accelerated aging. Recent studies have revealed that cells from WS patients can be successfully reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). In the present study, we describe the effects of long-term culture on WS iPSCs, which acquired and maintained infinite proliferative potential for self-renewal over 2 years. After long-term cultures, WS iPSCs exhibited stable undifferentiated states and differentiation capacity, and premature upregulation of senescence-associated genes in WS cells was completely suppressed in WS iPSCs despite WRN deficiency. WS iPSCs also showed recapitulation of the phenotypes during differentiation. Furthermore, karyotype analysis indicated that WS iPSCs were stable, and half of the descendant clones had chromosomal profiles that were similar to those of parental cells. These unexpected properties might be achieved by induced expression of endogenous telomerase gene during reprogramming, which trigger telomerase reactivation leading to suppression of both replicative senescence and telomere dysfunction in WS cells. These findings demonstrated that reprogramming suppressed premature senescence phenotypes in WS cells and WS iPSCs could lead to chromosomal stability over the long term. WS iPSCs will provide opportunities to identify affected lineages in WS and to develop a new strategy for the treatment of WS.

Indexed as

AdultAging, PrematureCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingCellular SenescenceChromosomal InstabilityHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasmsPhenotypeTelomeraseTelomereTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID25390333
PMCPMC4229309
OpenAlexW2012174476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.