Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25389805›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2015

Preserving HIV-specific T cell responses: does timing of antiretroviral therapy help?

Bernard J C Macatangay, Charles R Rinaldo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. CD8Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optimal control therapy and vaccination for special HIV-1 model with delay.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bernard J C MacatangayaDivision of Infectious Diseases bDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine cDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Charles R Rinaldo
GTx (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

AIDS Clinical Trials Group NetworkU01AI068636 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI KURITZKES, DANIEL R. · 2006 to 2010
$147.1M
University of Pittsburgh Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)U01AI035041 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARTINSON, JEREMY JAMES, RINALDO, CHARLES R · 1993 to 2018
$71.4M
METHODOLOGICAL EXPERTISE IN INTREPRETING MACS DATAU01AI035043 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBSON, LISA P · 1993 to 2011
$26.9M
Center for the Analysis & Management of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort StudyUM1AI035043 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI D'SOUZA, GYPSYAMBER, JACOBSON, LISA P · 2012 to 2018
$20.7M
Anti-HIV T Cell Responses During Antiviral Drug TherapyR37AI041870 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RINALDO, CHARLES R · 2004 to 2013
$3.3M
Dipyridamole as a Modulator of HIV-1 Inflammation by Adenosine RegulationU01AI110410 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MACATANGAY, BERNARD JONAS C, RIDDLER, SHARON · 2014 to 2017
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI041870NIAID NIH HHS R37-AI41870NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI035041NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068636NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI068636NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI110410NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI110410NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI35041NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI035043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHIV-specific T cell responses are likely to have an important role in HIV cure strategies that aim for long-lasting viral control without antiretroviral therapy (ART). An important issue in enhancing virus-specific T cell responses is whether timing of ART can influence their magnitude and breadth. RECENT

findingsEarly ART is associated with lower T cell activation, preservation of T cell numbers, smaller DNA and RNA reservoir size, and, in a single study (VISCONTI), control of plasma viremia after treatment interruption. The prevention of T cell destruction by early ART is associated with relatively low anti-HIV CD8⁺ T cell responses but stronger CD4⁺ T helper function. The relatively lower CD8⁺T cell response, which is presumably due to rapid lowering of HIV antigen burden after early ART, appears sufficient to control residual viral replication as well as viral rebound upon treatment interruption. SUMMARY: Available evidence of starting ART during acute or early HIV infection has shown benefit in both virologic and immunologic parameters despite the lower HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses observed. Encouraging as this is, more extensive data are necessary to evaluate its role in combination with immunotherapeutic and latency activation strategies that are being assessed in various HIV cure-related studies.

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsCD4-CD8 RatioCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID25389805
PMCPMC4610392
OpenAlexW2329355584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.