Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25389472›Full record

ArticleIranian Red Crescent medical journal2014

Prophylactic aminophylline for prevention of apnea at higher-risk preterm neonates.

Amir Mohammad Armanian, Zohreh Badiee, Raha Afghari, Nima Salehimehr, Akbar Hassanzade, Soghra Sheikhzadeh, Maryam Sharif Tehrani, Gohar Rezvan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian Red Crescent medical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amir Mohammad ArmanianDepartment of Pediatrics, Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Zohreh BadieeDepartment of Pediatrics, Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Raha AfghariIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Nima SalehimehrAl-Mahdi University, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Akbar HassanzadeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Soghra SheikhzadehNICU Ward, Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Maryam Sharif TehraniNICU Ward, Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Gohar RezvanNICU Ward, Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA few studies have been carried on preventive drugs for apnea of preterm neonates.

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the safety and prophylactic effects of aminophylline on the incidence of apnea in premature neonates. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) research. The prophylactic effect of aminophylline on apnea was investigated in premature babies in our NICU (IRAN-Isfahan). In the study group (A), 5 mg/kg aminophylline was initially administered as a loading dose. Then, every 8 hours, 1.5 mg/kg was given as maintenance dose for the next 10 days. In the control group (C), no aminophylline was used during the first ten days of life.

resultsFifty-two neonates were randomized for the study and all of them completed it. Primary outcomes were clearly different between the two groups. Only 2 infants (7.7%) who had been placed in aminophylline group developed apnea, as compared to 16 infants (61.5%) in the control group (P < 0.001). Three and four neonates (11.5%, 15.4%) in the aminophylline group developed bradycardia and cyanosis respectively, as compared to 16 infants (61.5%) who did not receive aminophylline (P < 0.001). Median time of need to NCPAP (Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) was 1 (0 - 4) days and 2.5 (0.5 - 6.5) days in group A and C, respectively (P = 0.03). No side effects were reported in neonates (P > 0.999). Median time of hospitalization was shorter in aminophylline group (P = 0.04).

conclusionsThis study supports the preventative effects of aminophylline on apnea in extreme premature infants. In other words, the more premature an infant, the greater the preventative effect of aminophylline on the incidence of apnea and bradycardia.

Indexed as

AminophyllineApnea of PrematurityMethyl xanthine TherapyPremature Infant

Identifiers

PMID25389472
PMCPMC4221998
OpenAlexW2167311442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.