Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25389452›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2014

Biodistribution and Efficacy Studies of the Proteasome Inhibitor BSc2118 in a Mouse Melanoma Model.

Izabela Mlynarczuk-Bialy, Thorsten R Doeppner, Jakub Golab, Dominika Nowis, Grzegorz M Wilczynski, Kamil Parobczak, Moritz E Wigand, Malgorzata Hajdamowicz, Lukasz P Biały, Olga Aniolek and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. KCTD5 and Ubiquitin Proteasome Signaling Are Required forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Izabela Mlynarczuk-BialyDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Thorsten R DoeppnerDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jakub GolabDepartment of Immunology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Dominika NowisDepartment of Immunology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz M WilczynskiNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland.
Kamil ParobczakNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland.
Moritz E WigandInstitute of Biochemistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Malgorzata HajdamowiczDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Lukasz P BiałyDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Olga AniolekWarsaw University of Life Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Department of Large Animal Diseases with the Clinic Division of Large Animal Internal Diseases, Warsaw, Poland.
Petra HenkleinInstitute of Biochemistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Mathias BährDepartment of Neurology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Boris SchmidtClemens Schapf Institute for Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Ulrike KuckelkornInstitute of Biochemistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter-M KloetzelInstitute of Biochemistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInstytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PLTechnische Universität Darmstadt · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of the proteasome offers many therapeutic possibilities in inflammation as well as in neoplastic diseases. However, clinical use of proteasome inhibitors is limited by the development of resistance or severe side effects. In our study we characterized the anti-tumor properties of the novel proteasome inhibitor BSc2118. The sensitivity of tumor lines to BSc2118 was analyzed in comparison to bortezomib using crystal violet staining in order to assess cell viability. The In Vivo distribution of BSc2118 in mouse tissues was tracked by a fluorescent-modified form of BSc2118 (BSc2118-FL) and visualized by confocal microscopy. Inhibition of the 20S proteasome was monitored both in cultured cell lines and in mice, respectively. Finally, safety and efficacy of BSc2118 was evaluated in a mouse melanoma model. BSc2118 inhibits proliferation of different tumor cell lines with a similar potency as compared with bortezomib. Systemic administration of BSc2118 in mice is well tolerated, even when given in a dose of 60 mg/kg body weight. After systemic injection of BSc2118 or bortezomib similar proteasome inhibition patterns are observed within the murine organs. Detection of BSc2118-FL revealed correlation of distribution pattern of BSc2118 with inhibition of proteasomal activity in cells or mouse tissues. Finally, administration of BSc2118 in a mouse melanoma model shows significant local anti-tumor effects. Concluding, BSc2118 represents a novel low-toxic agent that might be alternatively used for known proteasome inhibitors in anti-cancer treatment.

Identifiers

PMID25389452
PMCPMC4225687
OpenAlexW2127071017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.