Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25389425›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2014

Classical and Alternative Activation and Metalloproteinase Expression Occurs in Foam Cell Macrophages in Male and Female ApoE Null Mice in the Absence of T and B Lymphocytes.

Elaine Mo Hayes, Aikaterini Tsaousi, Karina Di Gregoli, S Rhiannon Jenkinson, Andrew R Bond, Jason L Johnson, Laura Bevan, Anita C Thomas, Andrew C Newby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Foam Cells: One Size Doesn't Fit All.Trends in immunology · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elaine Mo HayesBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Aikaterini TsaousiBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Karina Di GregoliBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
S Rhiannon JenkinsonBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Andrew R BondBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Jason L JohnsonBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Laura BevanBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Anita C ThomasBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Andrew C NewbyBristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
University of Bristol · GBBristol Royal Infirmary · GBNIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/07/053/24069British Heart Foundation PG/13/48/30341British Heart Foundation RG/09/006/27918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRupture of advanced atherosclerotic plaques accounts for most life-threatening myocardial infarctions. Classical (M1) and alternative (M2) macrophage activation could promote atherosclerotic plaque progression and rupture by increasing production of proteases, including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Lymphocyte-derived cytokines may be essential for generating M1 and M2 phenotypes in plaques, although this has not been rigorously tested until now. METHODS AND

resultsWe validated the expression of M1 markers (iNOS and COX-2) and M2 markers (arginase-1, Ym-1, and CD206) and then measured MMP mRNA levels in mouse macrophages during classical and alternative activation in vitro. We then compared mRNA expression of these genes ex vivo in foam cells from subcutaneous granulomas in fat-fed immune-competent ApoE knockout (KO) and immune-compromised ApoE/Rag-1 double-KO mice, which lack all T and B cells. Furthermore, we performed immunohistochemistry in subcutaneous granulomas and in aortic root and brachiocephalic artery atherosclerotic plaques to measure the extent of M1/M2 marker and MMP protein expression in vivo. Classical activation of mouse macrophages with bacterial lipopolysaccharide in vitro increased MMPs-13, -14, and -25 but decreased MMP-19 and TIMP-2 mRNA expressions. Alternative activation with IL-4 increased MMP-19 expression. Foam cells in subcutaneous granulomas expressed all M1/M2 markers and MMPs at ex vivo mRNA and in vivo protein levels, irrespective of Rag-1 genotype. There were also similar percentages of foam cell macrophages (FCMs) carrying M1/M2 markers and MMPs in atherosclerotic plaques from ApoE KO and ApoE/Rag-1 double-KO mice.

conclusionClassical and alternative activation leads to distinct MMP expression patterns in mouse macrophages in vitro. M1 and M2 polarization in vivo occurs in the absence of T and B lymphocytes in either granuloma or plaque FCMs.

Indexed as

atherosclerosiscytokineslymphocytesmacrophagesplaque rupture

Identifiers

PMID25389425
PMCPMC4211548
OpenAlexW1996287409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.