ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014
Modeling adaptation of carbon use efficiency in microbial communities.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic inequality in microbial communities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Conservation agriculture buffers persistent carbon loss under warming by microbial adaptation.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Emerging multiscale insights on microbial carbon use efficiency in the land carbon cycle.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Dynamics of carbon substrate competition among heterotrophic microorganisms.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- Land use effects on soil microbiome composition and traits with consequences for soil carbon cycling.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Energetic scaling in microbial growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- The role of bio-pollutants in the indoor air quality of old museum buildings: artworks biodeterioration as preview of human diseases.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- Linking Genes to Traits in Fungi.Microbial ecology · 2021Article
- Article
- Exploring Trait Trade-Offs for Fungal Decomposers in a Southern California Grassland.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency show seasonal responses in a multifactorial climate change experiment.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change.The ISME journal · 2020Review
- Soil Metatranscriptomes Under Long-Term Experimental Warming and Drying: Fungi Allocate Resources to Cell Metabolic Maintenance Rather Than Decay.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Managing Agroecosystems for Soil Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency: Ecological Unknowns, Potential Outcomes, and a Path Forward.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Role of carbon allocation efficiency in the temperature dependence of autotroph growth rates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Flexible Carbon-Use Efficiency across Litter Types and during Decomposition Partly Compensates Nutrient Imbalances-Results from Analytical Stoichiometric Models.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In new microbial-biogeochemical models, microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) is often assumed to decline with increasing temperature. Under this assumption, soil carbon losses under warming are small because microbial biomass declines. Yet there is also empirical evidence that CUE may adapt (i.e., become less sensitive) to warming, thereby mitigating negative effects on microbial biomass. To analyze potential mechanisms of CUE adaptation, I used two theoretical models to implement a tradeoff between microbial uptake rate and CUE. This rate-yield tradeoff is based on thermodynamic principles and suggests that microbes with greater investment in resource acquisition should have lower CUE. Microbial communities or individuals could adapt to warming by reducing investment in enzymes and uptake machinery. Consistent with this idea, a simple analytical model predicted that adaptation can offset 50% of the warming-induced decline in CUE. To assess the ecosystem implications of the rate-yield tradeoff, I quantified CUE adaptation in a spatially-structured simulation model with 100 microbial taxa and 12 soil carbon substrates. This model predicted much lower CUE adaptation, likely due to additional physiological and ecological constraints on microbes. In particular, specific resource acquisition traits are needed to maintain stoichiometric balance, and taxa with high CUE and low enzyme investment rely on low-yield, high-enzyme neighbors to catalyze substrate degradation. In contrast to published microbial models, simulations with greater CUE adaptation also showed greater carbon storage under warming. This pattern occurred because microbial communities with stronger CUE adaptation produced fewer degradative enzymes, despite increases in biomass. Thus, the rate-yield tradeoff prevents CUE adaptation from driving ecosystem carbon loss under climate warming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.