Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25388563›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy to traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Angus J M Watson, Hanne Bruhn, Kathleen MacLeod, Alison McDonald, Gladys McPherson, Mary Kilonzo, John Norrie, Malcolm A Loudon, Kirsty McCormack, Brian Buckley and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04675177 (Sclerotherapy With Polidocanol Foam Versus Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Recto Anal Repair in the Treatment of Second and Third-grade Hemorrhoidal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04675177 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Sclerotherapy With Polidocanol Foam Versus Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Recto Anal Repair in the Treatment of Second and Third-grade Hemorrhoidal Disease: a Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade do PortoRan2019 to 2020Enrolled45ConditionsHemorrhoidsArmsPolidocanol foam sclerotherapy, Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Angus J M WatsonDepartment of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Old Perth Road, Inverness IV2 3UJ, UK. angus.watson@nhs.net.
Hanne Bruhn
Kathleen MacLeod
Alison McDonald
Gladys McPherson
Mary Kilonzo
John Norrie
Malcolm A Loudon
Kirsty McCormack
Brian Buckley
Steven Brown
Finlay Curran
David Jayne
Ramesh Rajagopal
Jonathan A Cook
eTHoS study group

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0601938Medical Research Council G1002292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent interventions for haemorrhoidal disease include traditional haemorrhoidectomy (TH) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) surgery. However, uncertainty remains as to how they compare from a clinical, quality of life (QoL) and economic perspective. The study is therefore designed to determine whether SH is more effective and more cost-effective, compared with TH. METHODS/

designeTHoS (either Traditional Haemorrhoidectomy or Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy for Haemorrhoidal Disease) is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Currently, 29 secondary care centres are open to recruitment. Patients, aged 18 year or older, with circumferential haemorrhoids grade II to IV, are eligible to take part. The primary clinical and economic outcomes are QoL profile (area under the curve derived from the EuroQol Group's 5 Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) at all assessment points) and incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) based on the responses to the EQ-5D at 24 months. The secondary outcomes include a comparison of the SF-36 scores, pain and symptoms sub-domains, disease recurrence, complication rates and direct and indirect costs to the National Health Service (NHS). A sample size of n =338 per group has been calculated to provide 90% power to detect a difference in the mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.25 standard deviations derived from EQ-5D score measurements, with a two-sided significance level of 5%. Allowing for non-response, 400 participants will be randomised per group. Randomisation will utilise a minimisation algorithm that incorporates centre, grade of haemorrhoidal disease, baseline EQ-5D score and gender. Blinding of participants and outcome assessors is not attempted. DISCUSSION: This is one of the largest trials of its kind. In the United Kingdom alone, 29,000 operations for haemorrhoidal disease are done annually. The trial is therefore designed to give robust evidence on which clinicians and health service managers can base management decisions and, more importantly, patients can make informed choices.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN80061723 (assigned 8 March 2010).

Indexed as

Research DesignSurgical StaplingClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsHumansPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25388563
PMCPMC4289313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.