ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2014
[New possibilities for ocular surface reconstruction: collagen membranes and biocompatible elastomer nanofibers].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Pediatric corneal surgery and corneal transplantation].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmniotic membranes have been used for many years for reconstruction of the ocular surface. Despite having anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic properties as well as being suitable as a carrier for corneal epithelial cells, amniotic membranes also have some limitations for use at the human cornea: availability is limited, there are major interindividual variations in structure and growth factor content and are not free from the risk of disease transmission. Progress in tissue engineering has been made aiming at the development and improvement of alternative biomaterials.
objectivesThis article presents new approaches for reconstruction of the corneal surface with collagen-based biomaterials and polymers. MATERIAL AND
methodsElectronic databases were searched for articles which evaluated collagenous biomaterials for use at the corneal surface. In addition the authors' own experiences with novel biomaterials are described.
resultsIn vitro evaluation of the described biomaterials suggested a high biocompatibility with corneal epithelial cells in cell cultures. In vivo experiments with these materials in animal corneas demonstrated a certain variability in degradation and remodeling. Although some materials showed promising experimental results none of these are established in the clinical routine and only few clinical studies have so far been conducted with collagen-based biomaterials.
conclusionAlthough the majority of the described biomaterials are currently still in the experimental stage, a transfer into the clinical routine is conceivable and of great therapeutic interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.