Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25387008›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Bacterial endophytic communities in the grapevine depend on pest management.

Andrea Campisano, Livio Antonielli, Michael Pancher, Sohail Yousaf, Massimo Pindo, Ilaria Pertot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Changes in the Endophytic Bacterial Community ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. The Endophytic Microbiome of Wild GrapevinesPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Relationship of the Pine Growth PromotingLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea CampisanoResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), S. Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.
Livio AntonielliResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), S. Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy; Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Department of Health & Environment, Bioresources Unit, Tulln, Austria.
Michael PancherResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), S. Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.
Sohail YousafResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), S. Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy; Department of Environmental Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Massimo PindoResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), S. Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.
Ilaria PertotResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), S. Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial plant endophytes are receiving ever-increasing attention as a result of compelling evidence regarding functional interaction with the host plant. Microbial communities in plants were recently reported to be influenced by numerous environmental and anthropogenic factors, including soil and pest management. In this study we used automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) fingerprinting and pyrosequencing of 16S rDNA to assess the effect of organic production and integrated pest management (IPM) on bacterial endophytic communities in two widespread grapevines cultivars (Merlot and Chardonnay). High levels of the dominant Ralstonia, Burkholderia and Pseudomonas genera were detected in all the samples We found differences in the composition of endophytic communities in grapevines cultivated using organic production and IPM. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to the Mesorhizobium, Caulobacter and Staphylococcus genera were relatively more abundant in plants from organic vineyards, while Ralstonia, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas were more abundant in grapevines from IPM vineyards. Minor differences in bacterial endophytic communities were also found in the grapevines of the two cultivars.

Indexed as

Pest ControlBacteriaBurkholderiaDNA, RibosomalEndophytesItalyMicrobial ConsortiaPseudomonasRalstoniaSequence Analysis, DNAVitisDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID25387008
PMCPMC4227848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.