ArticleJournal of oral & maxillofacial research2014
The influence of 1α.25-dihydroxyvitamin d3 coating on implant osseointegration in the rabbit tibia.
Article in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does vitamin D have an effect on osseointegration of dental implants? A systematic review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2022Pooled it
- Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants in patients with vitamin D deficiency.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Can Vitamin D Levels Influence Bone Metabolism and Osseointegration of Dental Implants? An Umbrella Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Hormone and implant osseointegration: Elaboration of the relationship among function, preclinical, and clinical practice.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Possible Roles of Vitamin D in Bone Grafting.Cureus · 2021Review
- Impact of the 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol Concentration and Vitamin D Deficiency Treatment on Changes in the Bone Level at the Implant Site during the Process of Osseointegration: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Low serum vitamin D and early dental implant failure: Is there a connection? A retrospective clinical study on 1740 implants placed in 885 patients.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2018Article
- Reducing the risk of impaired bone apposition to titanium screws with the use of fibroblast growth factor-2-apatite composite layer coating.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2017Article
- Vitamin D deficiency in early implant failure: two case reports.International journal of implant dentistry · 2016Article
- Biological characterization of a new silicon based coating developed for dental implants.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2016Article
- Is Low Serum Vitamin D Associated with Early Dental Implant Failure? A Retrospective Evaluation on 1625 Implants Placed in 822 Patients.Mediators of inflammation · 2016Article
- Evaluation of the effects of topically applied simvastatin on titanium implant osseointegration.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
- Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Post-Bariatric Patients: An Underestimated Risk in Oral Surgery? Clinical Implications and Perspectives.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric DentistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate bone response to an implant surface modified by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1.25-(OH)2D3] in vivo and the potential link between 1.25-(OH) 2D3 surface concentration and bone response. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwenty-eight implants were divided into 4 groups (1 uncoated control, 3 groups coated with 1.25-(OH)2D3 in concentrations of 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) M respectively), placed in the rabbit tibia for 6 weeks. Topographical analyses were carried out on coated and uncoated discs using interferometer and atomic-force-microscope (AFM). Twenty-eight implants were histologically observed (bone-to-implant-contact [BIC] and new-bone-area [NBA]).
resultsThe results showed that the 1.25-(OH)2D3 coated implants presented a tendency to osseointegrate better than the non-coated surfaces, the differences were not significant (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe effect of 1.25-(OH)2D3 coating to implants suggested possible dose dependent effects, however no statistical differences could be found. It is thought that the base substrate topography (turned) could not sustain sufficient amount of 1.25-(OH)2D3 enough to present significant biologic responses. Thus, development a base substrate that can sustain 1.25-(OH)2D3 for a long period is necessary in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.