ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2014
Instrumented functional reach test differentiates individuals at high risk for Parkinson's disease from controls.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Wearable sensor use for assessing standing balance and walking stability in people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Wearable Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review and Evidence Map.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Teleneurorehabilitation and Motor and Nonmotor Symptoms and Quality of Life in Parkinson Disease: The TELEPARK Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2025Article
- Immediate effects of verbal instructions with internal focus of attention and external focus of attention on forward reach movement while standing.Journal of physical therapy science · 2023Article
- Statistical Analysis and Kinematic Assessment of Upper Limb Reaching Task in Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Motor, cognitive and mobility deficits in 1000 geriatric patients: protocol of a quantitative observational study before and after routine clinical geriatric treatment - the ComOn-study.BMC geriatrics · 2020Observational
- Wearables for gait and balance assessment in the neurological ward - study design and first results of a prospective cross-sectional feasibility study with 384 inpatients.BMC neurology · 2018Article
- Patient reported outcomes in GNE myopathy: incorporating a valid assessment of physical function in a rare disease.Disability and rehabilitation · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Balance Disorders in Parkinson's Disease Using Simple Diagnostic Tests-Not So Simple to Choose.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Review
- Past, present, and future of Parkinson's disease: A special essay on the 200th Anniversary of the Shaking Palsy.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2017Review
- Advances in markers of prodromal Parkinson disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The functional reach (FR) test as a complex measure of balance including limits of stability has been proven to differentiate between patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and controls (CO). Recently, it has been shown that the instrumentation of the FR (iFR) with a wearable sensor may increase this diagnostic accuracy. This cross-sectional study aimed at investigating whether the iFR has the potential to differentiate individuals with high risk for PD (HRPD) from CO, as the delineation of such individuals would allow for, e.g., early neuromodulation. Thirteen PD patients, 13 CO, and 31 HRPD were investigated. HRPD was defined by presence of an enlarged area of hyperechogenicity in the mesencephalon on transcranial sonography and either one motor sign or two risk and prodromal markers of PD. All participants were asked to reach with their right arm forward as far as possible and hold this position for 10 s. During this period, sway parameters were assessed with an accelerometer (Dynaport, McRoberts) worn at the lower back. Extracted parameters that differed significantly between PD patients and CO in our cohort [FR distance (shorter in PD), anterior-posterior and mediolateral acceleration (both lower in PD)] as well as JERK, which has been shown to differentiate HRPD from CO and PD in a previous study, were included in a model, which was then used to differentiate HRPD from CO. The model yielded an area under the curve of 0.77, with a specificity of 85%, and a sensitivity of 74%. These results suggest that the iFR can contribute to an assessment panel focusing on the definition of HRPD individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.