ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Single-session minimally invasive management of common bile duct stones.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-stage laparoendoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A retrospective study comparing starting with ERCP versus with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Splenic subcapsular hematoma following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Splenic Subcapsular Hematoma After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.ACG case reports journal · 2023Article
- Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years' experience of a single institution.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Dual common bile duct examination with transcystic choledochoscopy and cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for suspected choledocholithiasis: a prospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Comparison of Endoscopy First and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy First Strategies for Patients With Gallstone Disease and Intermediate Risk of Choledocholithiasis: Protocol for a Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: a retrospectively cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Risk assessment of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its management options.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- Intraoperative ERCP for management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Routine Cysticotomy and Flushing of the Cystic Duct in Patients with Low Risk of Common Duct Stones: Can It Be Beneficial?Minimally invasive surgery · 2017Article
- A survey of European-African surgeons' management of common bile duct stones.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2016Article
- Early versus delayed laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stone-related nonsevere acute cholangitis.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Effects of intravenously infused lidocaine on analgesia and gastrointestinal function of patients receiving laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to 18% of patients submitted to cholecystectomy had concomitant common bile duct stones. To avoid serious complications, these stones should be removed. There is no consensus about the ideal management strategy for such patients. Traditionally, open surgery was offered but with the advent of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) minimally invasive approach had nearly replaced laparotomy because of its well-known advantages. Minimally invasive approach could be done in either two-session (preoperative ERCP followed by LC or LC followed by postoperative ERCP) or single-session (laparoscopic common bile duct exploration or LC with intraoperative ERCP). Most recent studies have found that both options are equivalent regarding safety and efficacy but the single-session approach is associated with shorter hospital stay, fewer procedures per patient, and less cost. Consequently, single-session option should be offered to patients with cholecysto-choledocholithiaisis provided that local resources and expertise do exist. However, the management strategy should be tailored according to many variables, such as available resources, experience, patient characteristics, clinical presentations, and surgical pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.