Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25385751›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2015

Decision-making Processes among Prostate Cancer Survivors with Rising PSA Levels: Results from a Qualitative Analysis.

Megan Johnson Shen, Christian J Nelson, Ellen Peters, Susan F Slovin, Simon J Hall, Matt Hall, Phapichaya Chaoprang Herrera, Elaine A Leventhal, Howard Leventhal, Michael A Diefenbach

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Qualitative studies on men with prostate cancer: a systematic meta-synthesis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factors influencing decisions people with motor neuron disease make about gastrostomy placement and ventilation: A qualitative evidence synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Strategies for living well with hormone-responsive advanced prostate cancer-a qualitative exploration.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient experiences of decision-making in the treatment of spinal metastases: a qualitative study.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Prostate cancer-related anxiety in long-term survivors after radical prostatectomy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan Johnson ShenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (MJS, CJN)
Christian J NelsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (MJS, CJN)
Ellen PetersDepartment of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (EP)
Susan F SlovinDepartment of Medicine; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (SFS)
Simon J HallDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SJH, MH, PCH, MAD)
Matt HallDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SJH, MH, PCH, MAD)
Phapichaya Chaoprang HerreraDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SJH, MH, PCH, MAD)
Elaine A LeventhalDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ (EAL, HL).
Howard LeventhalDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ (EAL, HL).
Michael A DiefenbachDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai, New York, NY (SJH, MH, PCH, MAD)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Psychosocial Palliative & Community Research in CancerT32CA009461 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JENNIFER L HAY, Jamie S. Ostroff · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
CANCER PREVENTION &CONTROL--MULTIDISCIPLINARY TRAININGR25CA081137 · NCI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI MONTGOMERY, GUY H · 1999 to 2014
$6.7M
The Functions of Affect in Treatment Decisions of Rising PSA PatientsR01CA118682 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI DIEFENBACH, MICHAEL A · 2007 to 2010
$991k
NCI NIH HHS 5R25-CA081137NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118682NCI NIH HHS R01-CA118682NCI NIH HHS R25 CA081137NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009461NCI NIH HHS T32-CA009461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer survivors with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level have few treatment options, experience a heightened state of uncertainty about their disease trajectory that might include the possibility of cancer metastasis and death, and often experience elevated levels of distress as they have to deal with a disease they thought they had conquered. Guided by self-regulation theory, the present study examined the cognitive and affective processes involved in shared decision making between physicians and patients who experience a rising PSA after definitive treatment for prostate cancer.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 34 prostate cancer survivors who had been diagnosed with a rising PSA (i.e., biochemical failure) within the past 12 months. Survivors were asked about their experiences and affective responses after being diagnosed with a rising PSA and while weighing potential treatment options. In addition, patients were asked about their decision-making process for the initial prostate cancer treatment.

resultsCompared with the initial diagnosis, survivors with a rising PSA reported increased negative affect following their diagnosis, concern about the treatability of their disease, increased planning and health behavior change, heightened levels of worry preceding doctor appointments (especially prior to the discussion of PSA testing results), and a strong reliance on physicians' treatment recommendations.

conclusionsProstate cancer survivors' decision-making processes for the treatment of a rising PSA are markedly different from those of the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer. Because patients experience heightened distress and rely more heavily on their physicians' recommendations with a rising PSA, interactions with the health care provider provide an excellent opportunity to address and assist patients with managing the uncertainty and distress inherent with rising PSA levels.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchSurvivorsProstate-Specific Antigenandrogen deprivation therapydecision makingprostate cancerrising prostate specific antigensurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID25385751
PMCPMC4424110
OpenAlexW1984867023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.