Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25385532›Full record

ArticleeLife2014

Predicting evolution from the shape of genealogical trees.

Richard A Neher, Colin A Russell, Boris I Shraiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard A NeherEvolutionary Dynamics and Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-1407
Colin A RussellDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Boris I ShraimanKavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given a sample of genome sequences from an asexual population, can one predict its evolutionary future? Here we demonstrate that the branching patterns of reconstructed genealogical trees contains information about the relative fitness of the sampled sequences and that this information can be used to predict successful strains. Our approach is based on the assumption that evolution proceeds by accumulation of small effect mutations, does not require species specific input and can be applied to any asexual population under persistent selection pressure. We demonstrate its performance using historical data on seasonal influenza A/H3N2 virus. We predict the progenitor lineage of the upcoming influenza season with near optimal performance in 30% of cases and make informative predictions in 16 out of 19 years. Beyond providing a tool for prediction, our ability to make informative predictions implies persistent fitness variation among circulating influenza A/H3N2 viruses.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEvolution, MolecularForecastingModels, GeneticBase SequenceGene FlowGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationHumansInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInheritance PatternsPhylogenySeasonsSequence Analysis, DNAadaptive evolutionevolutionary biologygenomicspopulation geneticsvaccine strain selectionviruses

Identifiers

PMID25385532
PMCPMC4227306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.