Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25385518›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2015

Rapid prototyped sutureless anastomosis device from self-curing silk bio-ink.

Rod R Jose, Waseem K Raja, Ahmed M S Ibrahim, Pieter G L Koolen, Kuylhee Kim, Abdurrahman Abdurrob, Jonathan A Kluge, Samuel J Lin, Gillian Beamer, David L Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The History and Innovations of Blood Vessel Anastomosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Compression of the vascular wall to create a friction fit in a vascular anastomotic coupler.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rod R JoseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology Center, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, 02155.
Waseem K RajaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology Center, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, 02155.
Ahmed M S IbrahimDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
Pieter G L KoolenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
Kuylhee KimDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
Abdurrahman AbdurrobDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology Center, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, 02155.
Jonathan A KlugeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology Center, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, 02155.
Samuel J LinDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
Gillian BeamerDepartment of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Grafton, MA 01536.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology Center, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, 02155.
Tufts University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520-09S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sutureless anastomosis devices are designed to reduce surgical time and difficulty, which may lead to quicker and less invasive cardiovascular anastomosis. The implant uses a barb-and-seat compression fitting composed of one male and two female components. The implant body is resorbable and capable of eluting heparin. Custom robotic deposition equipment was designed to fabricate the implants from a self-curing silk solution. Curing did not require deleterious processing steps but devices demonstrated high crush resistance, retention strength, and leak resistance. Radial crush resistance is in the range of metal vascular implants. Insertion force and retention strength of the anastomosis was dependent on fit sizing of the male and female components and subsequent vessel wall compression. Anastomotic burst strength was dependent on the amount of vessel wall compression, and capable of maintaining higher than physiological pressures. In initial screening using a porcine implant, the devices remained intact for 28 days (the length of study). Histological sections revealed cellular infiltration within the laminar structure of the male component, as well as at the interface between the male and female components. Initial degradation and absorption of the implant wall were observed. The speed per anastomosis using this new device was much faster than current systems, providing significant clinical improvement.

Indexed as

Materials TestingSilkStentsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsFemaleMaleSwineSilkbio-inkdrug deliveryresorbable implantsilksutureless anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID25385518
PMCPMC4427544
OpenAlexW1801412422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.