Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25385463›Full record

ArticleCancer microenvironment : official journal of the International Cancer Microenvironment Society2015

Clinical Impact of Regulatory T cells (Treg) in Cancer and HIV.

Theresa L Whiteside

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer microenvironment : official journal of the International Cancer Microenvironment Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Immunotherapy and predictive immunologic profile: the tip of the iceberg.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Theresa L WhitesideDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. whitesidetl@upmc.edu.

Funding

Tissue Procurement / ImmunohistologyP01CA109688 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCHLESSELMAN, JAMES J · 2006 to 2010
$5.9M
Restoring anti-tumor immunity in the microenvironment of head and neck cancerR01CA168628 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITESIDE, THERESA L. · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA109688NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of regulatory T cells, (Treg) in human cancer and HIV-1 infections has been under intense scrutiny. While the lack of a marker specific for human Treg has made it challenging to phenotype these cells, combinations of several markers and functional attributes of Treg have made it possible to assess their contributions to immune homeostasis in health and disease. Treg diversity and their plasticity create a challenge in deciding whether they are beneficial to the host by down-regulating excessive immune activation or are responsible for adverse effects such as suppression of anti-tumor immune responses resulting in promotion of tumor growth. Treg are emerging as active participants in several biochemical pathways involved in immune regulation. This review attempts to integrate current information about human Treg in respect to their activities in cancer and HIV-1. The goal is to evaluate the potential of Treg as targets for future immune or pharmacologic therapies for cancer or HIV-1 infections.

Indexed as

CancerHIV-1Immune RegulationImmunotherapyTreg

Identifiers

PMID25385463
PMCPMC4715004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.