Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25385113›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the activities of six parenteral vancomycin products available in the United States.

Arnold Louie, Michael T Boyne, Vikram Patel, Clayton Huntley, Weiguo Liu, Steven Fikes, Stephanie Kurhanewicz, Jaime Rodriquez, Nichole Robbins, David Brown and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and economic impact of generic versus brand name meropenem use in an intensive care unit in Colombia.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Arnold LouieInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA Arnold.Louie@medicine.ufl.edu.
Michael T BoyneDivision of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Science, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Vikram PatelDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Clayton HuntleyNational Institutes of Health, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bacteriology and Mycology Branch, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Weiguo LiuInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Steven FikesInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Stephanie KurhanewiczInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jaime RodriquezInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Nichole RobbinsInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
David BrownInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Dodge BaluyaInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
G L DrusanoInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
University of Florida · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · USFlorida College · USNational Institutes of Health · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

Optimization of Neoglycoside Antibiotics for Nosocomial Pathogens and Select AgenR01AI090802 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DRUSANO, GEORGE LOUIS, LOUIE, ARNOLD · 2010 to 2014
$4.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI090802NIAID NIH HHS R01AI090802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent report found that generic parenteral vancomycin products may not have in vivo efficacies equivalent to those of the innovator in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model despite having similar in vitro microbiological activities and murine serum pharmacokinetics. We compared the in vitro and in vivo activities of six of the parenteral vancomycin products available in the United States. The in vitro assessments for the potencies of the vancomycin products included MIC/minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) determinations, quantifying the impact of human and murine serum on the MIC values, and time-kill studies. Also, the potencies of the vancomycin products were quantified with a biological assay, and the human and mouse serum protein binding rates for the vancomycin products were measured. The in vivo studies included dose-ranging experiments with the 6 vancomycin products for three isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. The pharmacokinetics of the vancomycin products were assessed in infected mice by population pharmacokinetic modeling. No differences were seen across the vancomycin products with regard to any in vitro evaluation. Inhibitory sigmoid maximal bacterial kill (Emax) modeling of the relationship between vancomycin dosage and the killing of the bacteria in mice in vivo yielded similar Emax and EC50 (drug exposure driving one-half Emax) values for bacterial killing. Further, there were no differences in the pharmacokinetic clearances of the 6 vancomycin products from infected mice. There were no important pharmacodynamic differences in the in vitro or in vivo activities among the six vancomycin products evaluated.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleHumansInfusions, ParenteralMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMice, Inbred StrainsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusUnited StatesVancomycinBlood ProteinsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID25385113
PMCPMC4291350
OpenAlexW2101838661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.