Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25385107›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Lead clinical and preclinical antimalarial drugs can significantly reduce sporozoite transmission to vertebrate populations.

L M Upton, P M Brock, T S Churcher, A C Ghani, P W Gething, M J Delves, K A Sala, D Leroy, R E Sinden, A M Blagborough

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antimalarial efficacy of MMV390048, an inhibitor ofScience translational medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L M UptonDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
P M BrockDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
T S ChurcherDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
A C GhaniDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
P W GethingSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
M J DelvesDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
K A SalaDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
D LeroyMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.
R E SindenDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom Jenner Institute, the University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
A M BlagboroughDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom andrew.blagborough@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve malarial elimination, we must employ interventions that reduce the exposure of human populations to infectious mosquitoes. To this end, numerous antimalarial drugs are under assessment in a variety of transmission-blocking assays which fail to measure the single crucial criteria of a successful intervention, namely impact on case incidence within a vertebrate population (reduction in reproductive number/effect size). Consequently, any reduction in new infections due to drug treatment (and how this may be influenced by differing transmission settings) is not currently examined, limiting the translation of any findings. We describe the use of a laboratory population model to assess how individual antimalarial drugs can impact the number of secondary Plasmodium berghei infections over a cycle of transmission. We examine the impact of multiple clinical and preclinical drugs on both insect and vertebrate populations at multiple transmission settings. Both primaquine (>6 mg/kg of body weight) and NITD609 (8.1 mg/kg) have significant impacts across multiple transmission settings, but artemether and lumefantrine (57 and 11.8 mg/kg), OZ439 (6.5 mg/kg), and primaquine (<1.25 mg/kg) demonstrated potent efficacy only at lower-transmission settings. While directly demonstrating the impact of antimalarial drug treatment on vertebrate populations, we additionally calculate effect size for each treatment, allowing for head-to-head comparison of the potential impact of individual drugs within epidemiologically relevant settings, supporting their usage within elimination campaigns.

Indexed as

AdamantaneAnimalsAnophelesAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemisininsEthanolaminesFemaleFluorenesIndolesInsect VectorsLumefantrineMalariaMicePeroxidesPlasmodium bergheiAdamantaneAntimalarialsartefenomelArtemetherArtemisininsEthanolaminesFluorenesIndolesLumefantrineNITD 609PeroxidesPrimaquineSpiro Compounds

Identifiers

PMID25385107
PMCPMC4291391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.