Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25384902›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2014

A new clinically based staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, William S Harmsen, Carlos Romero Marrero, Mohammed M Aboelsoud, Albert Ndzengue, Joseph Kaiya, Terry M Therneau, William Sanchez, Gregory J Gores, Lewis R Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roongruedee Chaiteerakij1] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA [2] Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
William S HarmsenDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Carlos Romero MarreroDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mohammed M AboelsoudDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Albert NdzengueDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Joseph KaiyaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Terry M TherneauDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
William SanchezDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gregory J GoresDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Lewis R RobertsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
PILOT AND FEASIBILTY PROGRAMP30DK084567 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GREGORY J. GORES · 2009 to 2026
$22.2M
Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis in Biliary EpitheliaR01DK059427 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GORES, GREGORY J. · 2001 to 2016
$4.3M
Regulation of the Tumor Microenvironment in Hepatocellular CarcinomaR01CA165076 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI FERNANDEZ-ZAPICO, MARTIN ERNESTO, ROBERTS, LEWIS R · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Molecular Pathogenesis of Hepatocellular CarcinomaR01CA100882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROBERTS, LEWIS R · 2004 to 2008
$1.8M
Dysregulation of the Tumor Microenvironment in Hepatocellular CarcinomaR21CA128633 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROBERTS, LEWIS R · 2009 to 2010
$366k
Molecular Pathogenesis of Hepatocellular CarcinomaR56CA100882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROBERTS, LEWIS R · 2009 to 2009
$352k
Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis in Biliary EpitheliaR56DK059427 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GORES, GREGORY J. · 2006 to 2006
$243k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NCI NIH HHS CA100882NCI NIH HHS CA128633NCI NIH HHS CA165076NCI NIH HHS N01 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100882NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165076NCI NIH HHS R21 CA128633NCI NIH HHS R56 CA100882NIDDK NIH HHS DK59427NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK084567NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK084567NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK059427NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK059427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent staging systems for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) are inadequate, as they are based on surgical pathology and therefore not relevant to unresectable patients. Clinical trials for potential targeted therapies for pCCA are hampered by the lack of an accurate, nonoperative staging system for predicting survival. We aimed at developing a clinical staging system for pCCA, which would be of prognostic relevance for all pCCA patients and help stratify patients for clinical trials.

methodsClinical information at the time of pCCA diagnosis of 413 patients seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 2002 and 2010 was retrospectively analyzed. A survival predictive model was developed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. The performance of the staging system was compared with the current AJCC/UICC (the American Joint Committee on Cancer/the Union for International Cancer Control) 7th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system.

resultsEastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, tumor size and number, vascular encasement, lymph node and peritoneal metastasis and CA 19-9 level were grouped into a four-tier staging system. The median survivals of stages I, II, III, and IV patients were 48.6, 21.8, 8.6, and 2.8 months, with hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of 1.0 (reference), 1.7 (1.1-2.6), 3.1 (2.0-4.7), and 8.7 (5.2-14.5), respectively (P<0.0001). This staging system had greater concordance statistics (standard error) than the TNM staging system (0.725 (0.018) vs. 0.614 (0.017)), indicating better performance in predicting survival.

conclusionsThis staging system, based on nonoperative information at the time of pCCA diagnosis, has excellent discriminatory power to classify patients into four prognostic stages. It could be useful to clinicians and for the design of clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCA-19-9 AntigenCholangiocarcinomaCohort StudiesCystic DuctFemaleHepatic Duct, CommonHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisCA-19-9 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID25384902
PMCPMC4341961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.