Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25384765›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2014

Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Alexander J Lepak, David R Andes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Single-Dose, Intravenous, and Oral Pharmacokinetics of Isavuconazole in Dogs.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. DynamicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander J LepakUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705.
David R AndesUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful treatment of infectious diseases requires choice of the most suitable antimicrobial agent, comprising consideration of drug pharmacokinetics (PK), including penetration into infection site, pathogen susceptibility, optimal route of drug administration, drug dose, frequency of administration, duration of therapy, and drug toxicity. Antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies consider these variables and have been useful in drug development, optimizing dosing regimens, determining susceptibility breakpoints, and limiting toxicity of antifungal therapy. Here the concepts of antifungal PK/PD studies are reviewed, with emphasis on methodology and application. The initial sections of this review focus on principles and methodology. Then the pharmacodynamics of each major antifungal drug class (polyenes, flucytosine, azoles, and echinocandins) is discussed. Finally, the review discusses novel areas of pharmacodynamic investigation in the study and application of combination therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsDisease Models, AnimalEchinocandinsFlucytosineHumansMiceMycosesPolyenesRabbitsRatsTriazolesAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFlucytosinePolyenesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID25384765
PMCPMC4448584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.