ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2015
Onset rivalry: factors that succeed and fail to bias selection.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Memory color influences conscious object perception.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Enhanced perceptual selection of predicted stimulus orientations following statistical learning.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Exercise alone impacts short-term adult visual neuroplasticity in a monocular deprivation paradigm.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Predictive context biases binocular rivalry in children and adults with no positive relation to two measures of social cognition.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
- Recent cross-modal statistical learning influences visual perceptual selection.Journal of vision · 2018Article
- Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- The influence of action-effect anticipation on bistable perception: differences between onset rivalry and ambiguous motion.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2018Article
- Perceptual suppression of predicted natural images.Journal of vision · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This project examined whether previous visual history can bias perceptual dominance during onset rivalry. A predictive sequence of non-rivalrous stimuli preceded dichoptically presented rivalrous displays. One of the dichoptic images was the implied next step of the preceding sequence while the other was not. Observers reported their initial dominant percept. Across five experiments, we found that motion sequences biased perceptual selection such that a rivalrous stimulus that continued a motion sequence tended to dominate one that did not. However, signals generated by complex pattern of motion information or verbal-semantic information had no influence on selection. These results are consistent with the view that onset rivalry is an early phase of rivalry that is likely insensitive to modulation by factors originating beyond the visual system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.