Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25384454›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2015

Issues in interpreting the in vivo activity of Aurora-A.

Elena Shagisultanova, Roland L Dunbrack, Erica A Golemis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mechanisms for nonmitotic activation of Aurora-A at cilia.Biochemical Society transactions · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena ShagisultanovaFox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology , Philadelphia, PA 19111 , USA.
Roland L Dunbrack
Erica A Golemis
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
ROLES OF HEF1 IN CELL DIFFERENTIATION AND SURVIVALR01CA063366 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI GOLEMIS, ERICA A. · 1998 to 2013
$3.9M
Bayesian Statistics and Algorithms for Homology ModelingR01GM084453 · NIGMS · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI DUNBRACK, ROLAND L · 2008 to 2016
$2.6M
A Role for AMH Autocrine Signaling in NSCLCR21CA181287 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI GOLEMIS, ERICA A. · 2014 to 2015
$421k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA063366NCI NIH HHS R01CA63366NCI NIH HHS R21 CA181287NCI NIH HHS R21CA181287NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084453NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM084453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBased on its role as a mitotic regulatory kinase, overexpressed and associated with aneuploidy in cancer, small-molecule inhibitors have been developed for Aurora-A (AURKA) kinase. In preclinical and clinical assessments, these agents have shown efficacy in inducing stable disease or therapeutic response. In optimizing the use of Aurora-A inhibitors, it is critical to have robust capacity to measure the kinase activity of Aurora-A in tumors. AREAS COVERED: We provide an overview of molecular mechanisms of mitotic and non-mitotic activation of Aurora-A kinase, and interaction of Aurora-A with its regulatory partners. Typically, Aurora-A activity is measured by use of phospho-antibodies targeting an autophosphorylated T288 epitope. However, recent studies have identified alternative means of Aurora-A activation control, including allosteric regulation by partners, phosphorylation on alternative activating residues (S51, S98), dephosphorylation on inhibitory sites (S342) and T288 phosphorylation by alternative kinases such as Pak enzymes. Additional work has shown that the relative abundance of Aurora-A partners can affect the activity of Aurora-A inhibitors, and that Aurora-A activation also occurs in interphase cells. EXPERT OPINION: Taken together, this work suggests the need for comprehensive analysis of Aurora-A activity and expression of Aurora-A partners in order to stratify patients for likely therapeutic response.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAurora Kinase AHumansMitosisNeoplasmsPatient SelectionPhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsAurora Kinase AProtein Kinase Inhibitorsallosteric activationAURKAAurora-AcancerNEDD9PAKphosphorylationtargeted therapyTPX2

Identifiers

PMID25384454
PMCPMC4294965
OpenAlexW2003607443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.