Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25383719›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2015

Psychological sequelae of surgery in a prospective cohort of patients from three intraoperative awareness prevention trials.

Elizabeth L Whitlock, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Afton L Hassett, Amy M Shanks, Ellen Kolarik, Janet Houghtby, Hannah M West, Beth A Burnside, Erik Shumaker, Alex Villafranca and 10 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient periprocedural stress in cardiovascular medicine: friend or foe?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Elizabeth L WhitlockFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Psychology and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; and Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Thomas L Rodebaugh
Afton L Hassett
Amy M Shanks
Ellen Kolarik
Janet Houghtby
Hannah M West
Beth A Burnside
Erik Shumaker
Alex Villafranca
W Alex Edwards
Cheri A Levinson
Julia K Langer
Katya C Fernandez
Renee El-Gabalawy
Elizabeth Y Zhou
Jitender Sareen
Eric Jacobsohn
George A Mashour
Michael S Avidan

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR) (KL2)KL2RR024987 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHANLEY, THOMAS P. · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (TL1)TL1RR024995 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024987NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024987-01NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR024995NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElective surgery can have long-term psychological sequelae, especially for patients who experience intraoperative awareness. However, risk factors, other than awareness, for symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after surgery are poorly defined, and practical screening methods have not been applied to a broad population of surgical patients.

methodsThe Psychological Sequelae of Surgery study was a prospective cohort study of patients previously enrolled in the United States and Canada in 3 trials for the prevention of intraoperative awareness. The 68 patients who experienced definite or possible awareness were matched with 418 patients who denied awareness based on age, sex, surgery type, and awareness risk. Participants completed the PTSD Checklist-Specific (PCL-S) and/or a modified Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview telephone assessment to identify symptoms of PTSD and symptom complexes consistent with a PTSD diagnosis. We then used structural equation modeling to produce a composite PTSD score and examined potential risk factors.

resultsOne hundred forty patients were unreachable; of those contacted, 303 (88%) participated a median of 2 years postoperatively. Forty-four of the 219 patients (20.1%) who completed the PCL-S exceeded the civilian screening cutoff score for PTSD symptoms resulting from their surgery (15 of 35 [43%] with awareness and 29 of 184 [16%] without). Nineteen patients (8.7%; 5 of 35 [14%] with awareness and 14 of 184 [7.6%] without) both exceeded the cutoff and endorsed a breadth of symptoms consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition diagnosis of PTSD attributable to their surgery. Factors independently associated with PTSD symptoms were poor social support, previous PTSD symptoms, previous mental health treatment, dissociation related to surgery, perceiving that one's life was threatened during surgery, and intraoperative awareness (all P ≤ 0.017). Perioperative dissociation was identified as a potential mediator for perioperative PTSD symptoms.

conclusionsEvents in the perioperative period can precipitate psychological symptoms consistent with subsyndromal and syndromal PTSD. We not only confirmed the high rate of postoperative PTSD in awareness patients but also identified a significant rate in matched nonawareness controls. Screening surgical patients, especially those with potentially mediating risk factors such as intraoperative awareness or perioperative dissociation, for postoperative PTSD symptoms with the PCL-S is practical and could promote early referral, evaluation, and treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntraoperative AwarenessMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephone

Identifiers

PMID25383719
PMCPMC4535987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.