Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25383553›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Primary localization and tumor thickness as prognostic factors of survival in patients with mucosal melanoma.

Tarun Mehra, Gerd Grözinger, Steven Mann, Emmanuella Guenova, Rudolf Moos, Martin Röcken, Claus Detlef Claussen, Reinhard Dummer, Stephan Clasen, Aline Naumann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dermoscopic appearance of an amelanotic mucosal melanoma.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Vulvar cancer: a review for dermatologists.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarun MehraDepartment of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany; Medical Directorate, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gerd GrözingerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Steven MannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Emmanuella GuenovaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Rudolf MoosMedical Directorate, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Martin RöckenDepartment of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Claus Detlef ClaussenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Reinhard DummerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stephan ClasenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Aline NaumannInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Claus GarbeDepartment of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on survival with mucosal melanoma and on prognostic factors of are scarce. It is still unclear if the disease course allows for mucosal melanoma to be treated as primary cutaneous melanoma or if differences in overall survival patterns require adapted therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, this investigation is the first to present 10-year survival rates for mucosal melanomas of different anatomical localizations. METHODOLOGY: 116 cases from Sep 10 1984 until Feb 15 2011 retrieved from the Comprehensive Cancer Center and of the Central Register of the German Dermatologic Society databases in Tübingen were included in our analysis. We recorded anatomical location and tumor thickness, and estimated overall survival at 2, 5 and 10 years and the mean overall survival time. Survival times were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival times by localizations and by T-stages. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe found a median overall survival time of 80.9 months, with an overall 2-year survival of 71.7%, 5-year survival of 55.8% and 10-year survival of 38.3%. The 10-year survival rates for patients with T1, T2, T3 or T4 stage tumors were 100.0%, 77.9%, 66.3% and 10.6% respectively. 10-year survival of patients with melanomas of the vulva was 64.5% in comparison to 22.3% of patients with non-vulva mucosal melanomas.

conclusionSurvival times differed significantly between patients with melanomas of the vulva compared to the rest (p = 0.0006). It also depends on T-stage at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.0001).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMucous MembranePrognosisSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25383553
PMCPMC4226547
OpenAlexW2053610399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.