Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25383537›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Resolving the complexity of the human genome using single-molecule sequencing.

Mark J P Chaisson, John Huddleston, Megan Y Dennis, Peter H Sudmant, Maika Malig, Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Francesca Antonacci, Urvashi Surti, Richard Sandstrom, Matthew Boitano and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 461 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
461citing papers in PubMed
40.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

461 citing papers in PubMed, 885 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

401 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark J P ChaissonDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
John Huddleston1] Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [2] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Megan Y DennisDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Peter H SudmantDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Maika MaligDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Fereydoun HormozdiariDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Francesca AntonacciDipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari 70125, Italy.
Urvashi SurtiDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.
Richard SandstromDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Matthew BoitanoPacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Jane M LandolinPacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
John A StamatoyannopoulosDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Michael W HunkapillerPacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Jonas KorlachPacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Evan E Eichler1] Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [2] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Seattle University · USPacific Biosciences (United States) · USUniversity of Washington · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Sequence and Assembly of Segmental DuplicationsR01HG002385 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Evan Eichler · 2001 to 2026
$13.3M
An Integrative Analysis of Structural Variation for the 1000 Genomes ProjectU41HG007497 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LEE, CHARLES · 2013 to 2017
$13.0M
Improving the Human Reference Genome ResourceU41HG007635 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, RICHARD K. · 2014 to 2017
$9.6M
Characterization of Human-Specific Duplicated Genes Implicated in NeurocognitiveK99NS083627 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DENNIS, MEGAN Y · 2013 to 2014
$180k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS HG002385NHGRI NIH HHS HG007497NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002385NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007497NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007635NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS083627NINDS NIH HHS K99NS083627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human genome is arguably the most complete mammalian reference assembly, yet more than 160 euchromatic gaps remain and aspects of its structural variation remain poorly understood ten years after its completion. To identify missing sequence and genetic variation, here we sequence and analyse a haploid human genome (CHM1) using single-molecule, real-time DNA sequencing. We close or extend 55% of the remaining interstitial gaps in the human GRCh37 reference genome--78% of which carried long runs of degenerate short tandem repeats, often several kilobases in length, embedded within (G+C)-rich genomic regions. We resolve the complete sequence of 26,079 euchromatic structural variants at the base-pair level, including inversions, complex insertions and long tracts of tandem repeats. Most have not been previously reported, with the greatest increases in sensitivity occurring for events less than 5 kilobases in size. Compared to the human reference, we find a significant insertional bias (3:1) in regions corresponding to complex insertions and long short tandem repeats. Our results suggest a greater complexity of the human genome in the form of variation of longer and more complex repetitive DNA that can now be largely resolved with the application of this longer-read sequencing technology.

Indexed as

GenomicsChromosome InversionChromosomes, Human, Pair 10Cloning, MolecularGC Rich SequenceGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHaploidyHumansMutagenesis, InsertionalReference StandardsSequence Analysis, DNATandem Repeat Sequences

Identifiers

PMID25383537
PMCPMC4317254
OpenAlexW2002438422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.