ReviewBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2014
Carbon-based smart nanomaterials in biomedicine and neuroengineering.
Review in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functionalization of carbon nanospheres with curcumin, polyethylene glycol and folic acid: potential use as drug carriers.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Electrical Stimulation of Cells: Drivers, Technology, and Effects.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- The mechanical, optical, and thermal properties of graphene influencing its pre-clinical use in treating neurological diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Carbon nanostructures: a comprehensive review of potential applications and toxic effects.3 Biotech · 2022Review
- Extrapolating neurogenesis of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells on electroactive and electroconductive scaffolds to dental and oral-derived stem cells.International journal of oral science · 2022Review
- Carbon Nanomaterials (CNMs) and Enzymes: From Nanozymes to CNM-Enzyme Conjugates and Biodegradation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Improved Biomedical Properties of Polydopamine-Coated Carbon Nanotubes.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Nanotechnology Facilitated Cultured Neuronal Network and Its Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Electroconductive Nanobiomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioelectricity · 2020Review
- Advances in nanotechnology-based strategies for the treatments of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Materials today. Bio · 2020Review
- Biomimetic carbon nanotubes for neurological disease therapeutics as inherent medication.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2020Review
- Carbon Quantum Dots: In vitro and in vivo Studies on Biocompatibility and Biointeractions for Optical Imaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
- Nanocomposites as biomolecules delivery agents in nanomedicine.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2019Review
- Mussel-Inspired Dopamine and Carbon Nanotube Leading to a Biocompatible Self-Rolling Conductive Hydrogel Film.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Uptake and intracellular accumulation of diamond nanoparticles - a metabolic and cytotoxic study.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017Article
- Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for Guiding Neural Regeneration.Accounts of chemical research · 2016Article
- The nanomaterial toolkit for neuroengineering.Nano convergence · 2016Review
- The Potential Role of Graphene in Developing the Next Generation of Endomaterials.BioMed research international · 2016Review
- Carbon Nanomaterials Interfacing with Neurons: An In vivo Perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Review
- Nanoparticle-Based and Bioengineered Probes and Sensors to Detect Physiological and Pathological Biomarkers in Neural Cells.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The search for advanced biomimetic materials that are capable of offering a scaffold for biological tissues during regeneration or of electrically connecting artificial devices with cellular structures to restore damaged brain functions is at the forefront of interdisciplinary research in materials science. Bioactive nanoparticles for drug delivery, substrates for nerve regeneration and active guidance, as well as supramolecular architectures mimicking the extracellular environment to reduce inflammatory responses in brain implants, are within reach thanks to the advancements in nanotechnology. In particular, carbon-based nanostructured materials, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and nanodiamonds (NDs), have demonstrated to be highly promising materials for designing and fabricating nanoelectrodes and substrates for cell growth, by virtue of their peerless optical, electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties. In this review we discuss the state-of-the-art in the applications of nanomaterials in biological and biomedical fields, with a particular emphasis on neuroengineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.