Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25383208›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2014

Developing antitussives the clinician's pipeline-what do we need?

Alyn H Morice

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. How does rhinovirus cause the common cold cough?BMJ open respiratory research · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alyn H MoriceHead Cardiorespiratory Studies, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
Castle Hill Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolving concept of cough hypersensitivity, an over activity of the afferent sensory nerves in the upper airways, has given new insights into the pathophysiology underlying chronic cough. Armed with this new information drug development aimed at reducing cough reflex sensitivity to normal has, for the first time, led to successful clinical studies. This review outlines the concepts underlying the inflammatory processes leading to cough hypersensitivity and demonstrates how knowledge of the molecular pharmacology of hypersensitivity provides a lead into drug targets. Initial hope that antagonists of TRP receptors would reduce clinical cough has been disappointing. Drugs such as theobromine, thalidomide and AF 219 which all have activity on afferent sensory nerves have shown promise in clinical trials. Large-scale phase three clinical studies are required to confirm these exciting findings.

Indexed as

antitussiveCoughhypersensitivitypharmacology

Identifiers

PMID25383208
PMCPMC4222922
OpenAlexW2134722950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.