ReviewJournal of tissue engineering2014
Quantitative assessment of barriers to the clinical development and adoption of cellular therapies: A pilot study.
Review in Journal of tissue engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology-Based Immunostimulants in Aquaculture: Mechanisms, Advances and Practical Applications.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Retarding human adipose-derived MSCs senescence and promoting tendon repair using cell sheet engineering with a histone methyltransferase inhibitor.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Volumetric Additive Manufacturing for Cell Printing: Bridging Industry Adaptation and Regulatory Frontiers.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Insights into bone and cartilage responses to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation: a review with quantitative comparisons.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Hurdles to uptake of mesenchymal stem cells and their progenitors in therapeutic products.The Biochemical journal · 2020Review
- Clinical Applications of Bone Tissue Engineering in Orthopedic Trauma.Current pathobiology reports · 2018Article
- Regenerative medicine provides alternative strategies for the treatment of anal incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2017Review
- Preclinical imaging methods for assessing the safety and efficacy of regenerative medicine therapies.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2017Review
- Tissue-Engineered Solutions in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Principles and Practice.Frontiers in surgery · 2017Review
- Tissue Engineering in Orthopaedics.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2016Review
- A Road Map to Commercialization of Cartilage Therapy in the United States of America.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2016Article
- A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Current standards and ethical landscape of engineered tissues-3D bioprinting perspective.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
- A quantitative, multi-national and multi-stakeholder assessment of barriers to the adoption of cell therapies.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been a large increase in basic science activity in cell therapy and a growing portfolio of cell therapy trials. However, the number of industry products available for widespread clinical use does not match this magnitude of activity. We hypothesize that the paucity of engagement with the clinical community is a key contributor to the lack of commercially successful cell therapy products. To investigate this, we launched a pilot study to survey clinicians from five specialities and to determine what they believe to be the most significant barriers to cellular therapy clinical development and adoption. Our study shows that the main concerns among this group are cost-effectiveness, efficacy, reimbursement, and regulation. Addressing these concerns can best be achieved by ensuring that future clinical trials are conducted to adequately answer the questions of both regulators and the broader clinical community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.