ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2015
Next day determination of ejaculatory sperm motility after overnight shipment of semen to remote locations.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Increased count, motility, and total motile sperm cells collected across three consecutive ejaculations within 24 h of oocyte retrieval: implications for management of men presenting with low numbers of motile sperm for assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2015Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a method for delayed assessment of sperm motility, after shipment of semen to a remote laboratory. Sperm in semen were labeled with the MitoTracker(®) Red CM-H(2)XRos reagent, and fixed with 3.7 % formaldehyde by the laboratory technicians at the origin of the semen. This treatment reflected well sperm mitochondrial activity, and the MitoTracker(®) signal was related to sperm motility and velocity for 2-3 days following ejaculation.
methodsSperm motility and velocity were evaluated manually and by computer assisted semen analysis (CASA), respectively. Fluorescence assessment of individual sperm was carried out with the computer assisted Metamorph v4.6.9 program. Emission levels of MitoTracker(®) spermatozoa were studied in room temperature and cooled semen, or in the respective room temperature swim-up sperm fractions following ejaculation, and on the second day (N = 103 samples, 89 men) and third day (N = 10 samples, 8 men).
resultsSperm with optical density (O.D.) ≥0.7 showed close correlations with ejaculatory sperm motility and velocity even after second day (r = 0.92, p < 0.001, N = 103 samples). Further, the multiple of sperm motility and velocity was also related to the proportion of high MitoTracker(®) reagent emission sperm (r = 0.83, p < 0.001, N = 103 samples). MitoTracker(®) dye fluorescence on the second day accurately reflected the ejaculatory sperm motility (r = 0.90, p < 0.001). Thus, a shipping delay would not adversely affect the results.
conclusionsThe delayed assessment of sperm motility in samples treated with MitoTracker(®) Red CM-H(2)XRos reagent and shipped to remote laboratory truly reflects the level of sperm motility at the time of the ejaculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.