Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25381465›Full record

Trial reportHuman genetics2015

Revisiting heritability accounting for shared environmental effects and maternal inheritance.

Chunyu Liu, Josée Dupuis, Martin G Larson, L Adrienne Cupples, Jose M Ordovas, Ramachandran S Vasan, James B Meigs, Paul F Jacques, Daniel Levy

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TheJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chunyu LiuThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, 01702, USA, liuchunyu2002@yahoo.com.
Josée Dupuis
Martin G Larson
L Adrienne Cupples
Jose M Ordovas
Ramachandran S Vasan
James B Meigs
Paul F Jacques
Daniel Levy

Funding

Framingham Project/LevyZIAHL006001 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI LEVY, DANIEL · 2009 to 2025
$51.1M
Common Genetic Variation and Quantitative Diabetes TraitsR01DK078616 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEIGS, JAMES B · 2008 to 2014
$5.0M
Rare Sequence Variation and Diabetes Quantitative TraitsU01DK078616 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEIGS, JAMES B · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Epidemiology of Precursors to Type 2 DiabetesK24DK080140 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEIGS, JAMES B · 2007 to 2016
$1.9M
THE FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY-N01HC25195-268025195-268025195N01HC025195 · HC · TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY · PI WOLF, PHILIP A · 2002 to 2006
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC025195NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-25195NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK080140NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078616NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK078616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heritability measures the proportion of phenotypic variation attributable to genetic factors. In addition to a shared nuclear genetic component, a number of additional variance components, such as spousal correlation, sibship, household and maternal effects, may have strong contributions to inter-individual phenotype variation. In humans, the confounding effects of these components on heritability have not been studied thoroughly. We sought to obtain unbiased heritability estimates for complex traits in the presence of multiple variance components and also to estimate the contributions of these variance components to complex traits. We compared regression and variance component methods to estimate heritability in simulations when additional variance components existed. We then revisited heritability for several traits in Framingham Heart Study (FHS) participants. Using simulations, we found that failure to account for or misclassification of necessary variance components yielded biased heritability estimates. The direction and magnitude of the bias varied depending on a variance structure and an estimation method. Using the best fitted models to account for necessary variance components, we found that heritability estimates for most FHS traits were overestimated, ranging from 4 to 47 %, when we compared models that considered necessary variance components to models that only considered familial relationships. Spousal correlation explained 14-36 % of phenotypic variation in several anthropometric and lifestyle traits. Maternal and sibling effects also contributed to phenotypic variation, ranging from 3 to 5 % and 4 to 7 %, respectively, in several anthropometric and metabolic traits. Our findings may explain, in part, the missing heritability for some traits.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenetic VariationModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableFemaleHumansMaleSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID25381465
PMCPMC4303043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.