Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25381258›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2014

Extrafloral nectar fuels ant life in deserts.

Adriana Aranda-Rickert, Patricia Diez, Brigitte Marazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adriana Aranda-RickertCentro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica de La Rioja-CRILAR-(CONICET), Entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, 5301 Anillaco, La Rioja, Argentina aaranda@crilar-conicet.gob.ar.
Patricia DiezCentro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica de La Rioja-CRILAR-(CONICET), Entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, 5301 Anillaco, La Rioja, Argentina.
Brigitte MarazziFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste-IBONE-(UNNE-CONICET), Sgto. Cabral 2131, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions mediated by extrafloral nectary (EFN)-bearing plants that reward ants with a sweet liquid secretion are well documented in temperate and tropical habitats. However, their distribution and abundance in deserts are poorly known. In this study, we test the predictions that biotic interactions between EFN plants and ants are abundant and common also in arid communities and that EFNs are only functional when new vegetative and reproductive structures are developing. In a seasonal desert of northwestern Argentina, we surveyed the richness and phenology of EFN plants and their associated ants and examined the patterns in ant-plant interaction networks. We found that 25 ant species and 11 EFN-bearing plant species were linked together through 96 pairs of associations. Plants bearing EFNs were abundant, representing ca. 19 % of the species encountered in transects and 24 % of the plant cover. Most ant species sampled (ca. 77 %) fed on EF nectar. Interactions showed a marked seasonal pattern: EFN secretion was directly related to plant phenology and correlated with the time of highest ant ground activity. Our results reveal that EFN-mediated interactions are ecologically relevant components of deserts, and that EFN-bearing plants are crucial for the survival of desert ant communities.

Indexed as

Ant–plant interactionsarid landsextrafloral nectariesphenologyplant defenceprotective mutualisms

Identifiers

PMID25381258
PMCPMC4262941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.