ReviewTranslational stroke research2015
The single and double blood injection rabbit subarachnoid hemorrhage model.
Review in Translational stroke research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Enteral Nimodipine on Endothelial Cell Apoptosis in an Animal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Model.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Calpastatin peptide attenuates early brain injury following experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Relation to Nitric Oxide and Endothelin-1 on Pathogenesis of Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rabbit.Translational stroke research · 2016Article
- Ultrasound guided double injection of blood into cisterna magna: a rabbit model for treatment of cerebral vasospasm.Biomedical engineering online · 2016Article
- Animal Models for the Study of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Are We Moving Towards Increased Standardization?Translational stroke research · 2016Article
- Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage--status quo and perspective.Translational stroke research · 2015Article
- What is early brain injury?Translational stroke research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, the rabbit subarachnoid hemorrhage model (SAH) has been used for investigating the post-hemorrhage pathology, especially with respect to understanding of the mechanisms of cerebral vasospasm. However, the molecular mechanisms of cerebral vasospasm remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, it is not clear whether the rabbit SAH model is suitable for the investigation of pathological conditions other than cerebral vasospasm, such as early brain injury. Therefore, the properties of the rabbit SAH model need to be validated, and the reasons for using the rabbit should be clarified. This review explores the settings and technical issues of establishing a rabbit cisterna magna single and double blood injection SAH model and discusses the characteristics and feasibilities of the models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25381219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.