ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015
Turkish version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life questionnaire.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Impairments, Activity Limitations, Balance, and Quality of Life between Patients with and without Meniscus Repair or Partial Meniscectomy Post-ACL Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Spanish Version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life Questionnaire: Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Validation.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Translation and Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life Questionnaire.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Dutch Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life Questionnaire.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Prescription of knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction?Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Translation, cross-adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the ACL-RSI Scale and ACL-QoL Questionnaire in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo test the measurement properties of Turkish version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire.
methodsOne hundred and nineteen patients with ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) completed internal consistency, agreement, construct validity, floor and ceiling effect analyses. Eighty out of 119 patients with ACL-R completed Turkish version of the ACL-QOL questionnaire twice for the test-retest reliability. A subgroup of thirty-nine patients undergoing physiotherapy were also asked to answer the ACL-QOL questionnaire, the Lysholm Knee Scale (LKS), Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) and the short form 36 (SF-36) at pre-operative, 16th week and 2 years post-operatively to assess responsiveness.
resultsThe questionnaire had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95). The paired t test showed no significant difference between the test-retest means. The intraclass correlation was excellent for reliability and agreement in five domains and overall score (ICC 0.95, 0.95, 0.97, 0.95, 0.96 and 0.95; p < 0.001). The standard error of measurement and the minimum detectable change (MDC95) were found to be 3.1 points and 8.7 points, respectively. The questionnaire showed a fair correlation (r = 0.23) with LKS and a poor correlation (r = 0.14) with KOS-ADLS; good and very good construct validity (r = 0.51, r = 0.62) with SF-36 physical component score and mental component score, respectively. No ceiling and floor effects were observed except the subdomain of 'work-related concerns' (22.9 %). A dramatic effect size was demonstrated at the 16th week (2.1) and 2 years (1.1) of follow-up.
conclusionTurkish version of the ACL-QOL questionnaire is a reproducible and responsive instrument that can be used in clinical studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25380970What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.