Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25380964›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2015

Safety, efficacy and response to a hydrocortisone rescue therapy protocol in children with refractory hypotension after cardiopulmonal bypass.

F Neunhoeffer, H Renk, M Hofbeck, Ch Grenz, Ch Haller, E Heimberg, I Gerbig, Ch Schlensak, M Kumpf

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F NeunhoefferDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Pulmology and Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, University Children's Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, 72076, Tübingen, Germany, felix.neunhoeffer@gmx.de.
H Renk
M Hofbeck
Ch Grenz
Ch Haller
E Heimberg
I Gerbig
Ch Schlensak
M Kumpf
University Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about which paediatric patients respond to hydrocortisone rescue therapy (HRT) with improvement of haemodynamic stability in refractory hypotension after cardiopulmonal bypass. Data were gathered retrospectively from children who received HRT in refractory hypotension after cardiopulmonary bypass in the period from 2000 to 2010. One hundred and sixty-six out of 1,273 children, 150 <1 year and 16 >1 year were enrolled. HRT improved haemodynamics significantly, increased blood pressure, decreased the vasoactive-inotropic score and plasma lactate concentrations in all children >1 year and in 82 % (123 out of 150) of the infants <1 year. Non-responders <1 year were significantly younger, lighter, mostly male infants and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass support time. Serum lactate and paediatric risk of mortality score were significantly higher in non-responders at time of initiation of HRT. Mortality was significantly higher in non-responders versus responders (2.44 vs. 13.5 %; p = 0.0008). HRT caused no adverse effects like electrolyte disturbances or hyperglycaemia. HRT in refractory hypotension after paediatric cardiac surgery is safe but not all infants <1 year show haemodynamic response to HRT. Non-response to HRT is associated with significantly higher mortality.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsAdolescentAge FactorsCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneHyperglycemiaHypotensionInfantLactic AcidMaleRetrospective StudiesHydrocortisoneLactic AcidSteroids

Identifiers

PMID25380964
OpenAlexW2032413867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.