Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25380762›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2016

Socioeconomic position and early adolescent smoking development: evidence from the British Youth Panel Survey (1994-2008).

Michael J Green, Alastair H Leyland, Helen Sweeting, Michaela Benzeval

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of UK Tobacco Control Policies on Inequalities in Youth Smoking Uptake: A Natural Experiment Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J GreenMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alastair H LeylandMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Helen SweetingMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Michaela BenzevalInstitute for Social & Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office DTF/11/16Chief Scientist Office SPHSU13Chief Scientist Office SPHSU2Medical Research Council MC_UP_A540_1021Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSmoking usually develops in adolescence and is patterned by socioeconomic position (SEP). We examined whether early adolescent smoking development and associations with SEP have changed over time in a population with well-developed tobacco control policies. We additionally investigated the relative importance of socioeconomic inequalities at different stages of smoking development.

methodsAn annual UK rotating panel survey including data from 5122 adolescents (51% male) aged 11-15 years between 1994 and 2008. Rates of smoking initiation, progression to occasional smoking (experimentation), progression to daily smoking (escalation), and quitting were examined using discrete-time event history analysis.

resultsInitiation, experimentation and escalation rates declined over the study period while quitting rates increased. Decreases in initiation were concentrated among older adolescents and decreases in escalation among those who spent a year or two as occasional smokers. Socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with higher rates of initiation and escalation, with similar findings across SEP measures. Inequalities in initiation were stronger at younger ages. There was less evidence of associations between SEP and quitting or experimentation. Inequalities in escalation remained constant over time, while inequalities in initiation widened before narrowing. Further modelling suggested that differential initiation rates contributed more to inequalities in daily smoking at age 15 than did differential escalation.

conclusionsIncreasing tobacco control in the UK is associated with reduced uptake and more quitting in early adolescence, but socioeconomic inequalities remain. Interventions should focus on reducing inequalities in initiation among early adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorHealth BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansMalePopulation SurveillancePovertyRisk FactorsSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionSocial ClassDisparitiesPublic policySocioeconomic statusSurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID25380762
PMCPMC4789819
OpenAlexW2102056173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.