ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015
European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611840 (Randomized Trial Comparing One-stage Robotic Approach Versus Two-stage Endo-laparoscopic Approach for Difficult Choledocholithiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial Comparing One-stage Robotic Approach Versus Two-stage Endo-laparoscopic Approach for Difficult Choledocholithiasis (REAL Trial)
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024Guideline
- Comparing robotic and open surgical techniques in gallbladder cancer management: a detailed systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programmes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Pooled it
- Towards standardized assessment of surgical difficulty in robotic hepatobiliary surgery: a comparative validation study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Combined Use of Microwave Sensing Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Monitoring and Imaging.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Comprehensive revenue comparison of pure robotic vs. hybrid robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectosigmoid cancer.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Unraveling Tumor-to-Tumor Metastasis: Insights into Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Challenges, and Treatment Modalities.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Review
- Evolution from laparoscopic to robotic radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a propensity score-matched comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Is implementation of robotic-assisted procedures in acute care general surgery cost-effective?Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Advances in minimally invasive liver surgery.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following an extensive literature search and a consensus conference with subject matter experts the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. Robotic surgery is still at its infancy, and there is a great potential in sophisticated electromechanical systems to perform complex surgical tasks when these systems evolve. 2. To date, in the vast majority of clinical settings, there is little or no advantage in using robotic systems in general surgery in terms of clinical outcome. Dedicated parameters should be addressed, and high quality research should focus on quality of care instead of routine parameters, where a clear advantage is not to be expected. 3. Preliminary data demonstrates that robotic system have a clinical benefit in performing complex procedures in confined spaces, especially in those that are located in unfavorable anatomical locations. 4. There is a severe lack of high quality data on robotic surgery, and there is a great need for rigorously controlled, unbiased clinical trials. These trials should be urged to address the cost-effectiveness issues as well. 5. Specific areas of research should include complex hepatobiliary surgery, surgery for gastric and esophageal cancer, revisional surgery in bariatric and upper GI surgery, surgery for large adrenal masses, and rectal surgery. All these fields show some potential for a true benefit of using current robotic systems. 6. Robotic surgery requires a specific set of skills, and needs to be trained using a dedicated, structured training program that addresses the specific knowledge, safety issues and skills essential to perform this type of surgery safely and with good outcomes. It is the responsibility of the corresponding professional organizations, not the industry, to define the training and credentialing of robotic basic skills and specific procedures. 7. Due to the special economic environment in which robotic surgery is currently employed special care should be taken in the decision making process when deciding on the purchase, use and training of robotic systems in general surgery. 8. Professional organizations in the sub-specialties of general surgery should review these statements and issue detailed, specialty-specific guidelines on the use of specific robotic surgery procedures in addition to outlining the advanced robotic surgery training required to safely perform such procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.